The principle of independence may at times not work in favor of an individual. This principle in advocacy asserts that an individual knows what is best for them at all time and that a person is the best expert of their life. However, in some instances, a person may think that they are making the right decision for their life, while in reality, they lack the appropriate information or expertise to make informed decisions. This is why it is important for health and social workers to act in their ‘duty of care' and assist an individual in making informed decisions. However, in some instances, clients may perceive this as a lack of support for what is the best for their interests. Therefore, according to the law individuals have the right to disregard advice from professionals and act on the principle of independence even though it may negatively affect their physical or mental outcome.
It is difficult to agree with the principle of independence because in some instances a person is not in the right state to exercise their right to independence. For example, in some situations, a person's judgment is influenced by specific beliefs and values; thus, if they make a decision based on these beliefs, they could jeopardize their well-being. In an instance whereby a person refuses medical attention because of their beliefs, and risks to harm others, then their right to exercise the principle of independence does not apply. According to Snow (2013), the principles of advocacy are supposed to guide individuals to act ethically. Therefore, when a person acts to promote their selfish interests, it is unethical and does not support the principle of independence.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Snow, K. (2013). The Importance of Advocacy and Advocacy Competencies in Human Service Professions. Journal of Human Services. Retrieved from: https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-418982810/the-importance-of-advocacy-and-advocacy-competencies
