Interview
Interview refers to a face to face conversation between two or more individuals. The main idea of initiating an interview is to collect relevant data and information regarding a particular phenomenon or problem (“Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design,” 2017). I prefer using interviews since this methodology has the strength of collecting first-hand information, which is reliable for given research. It ought to be noted that information collected using interviews satisfies the research purpose. The interview can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured. The main advantages associated with this methodology are; it is flexible, accurate data is collected, and data collected is in-depth
Data collection tools for interviews are an audio recorder that can be used to record sound audios from respondents. Audio stored can be used in the future and also provides first-hand information to given research. Digital cameras can be used in an interview to save videos and sound of the interviewing session. The camcorder is used in data collection in an interview. The camcorder can be used to collect sensitive information since an interview can respond to various interview questions and answer them exhaustively. These instruments used in an interview can result in the validity and reliability of data collected in an interview. These instruments ensure that information recorded during an interview session complies with honesty, integrity, and be relayed after research. Validity is achieved when using these instruments, data stored in these instruments can be traced since they have the capability of storing one to one correspondence, and the interviewed questions.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Response 1
James has proposed to use Questioners as his method of data collection. Questioners refer to a process of data collection where series and prompt questions are administered to an individual to answer them. Each individual engaged in a questioner is required to justify quality responses. The answers provided should be reliable and valid. His design of questioners is administering obvious questions to individuals; questioners should be clear and should not create biases to the respondent. I justify that this data collection technique is appropriate and easy to implement since questioners can be administered to a group. It is cost-effective, the identity of the respondent is protected; data collected is high quality and reliable. Finally, it is straightforward to analyze and visualize data collected in the questioner. Instruments proposed by my fellow peers are; paper questionnaire and form plus online questionnaires. I can justify these instruments apply to this research method, online form plus questionnaire is ease in initiating, cost-effective, and integrity of data collected is assured of. These data collection tools have guaranteed face, content validity, and data reliability. Content validity is achieved when a questioner can provide reliable information and data regarding research.
Response 2
Jane proposed to use observation as her method of data collection. Direct observation refers to the technique of collecting data and information directly from phenomena. My fellow justified that observation was the most appropriate method of data collection since it is easy to implement and administer. The accuracy of data is granted, and observation is universally accepted as a method of data collection and practice. The data collection tools this peer proposed to use are checklists and direct observations. These data collection tools allow an individual to collect data and make a judgment regarding the phenomena observed. These tools offer the observer a systematic technique of collecting data regarding a particular scenario, knowledge behavior, and skills. Hence I can justify that the instrument my peer proposed to use when conducting an observation is appropriate since the validity and reliability of data collected are granted.
References
Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. (2003), 41 (02), 41-1243-41-1243. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1243
Elyazgi, M., & ., .. (2018). Review of Gathering Data Instruments and Methods in Children Research. International Journal Of Engineering & Technology , 7 (3.21), 311. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17179
