Finding Truth
Physical reality clear observations provide scientific truths that can be put into tests using observations. The scientific methods should be applied in a way that rigorous testing and data re-examinations will determine the truth. Although it is hard to define truth, some epistemologists define truth as a specific belief that tends to be true if they are consistent or ‘coheres’ with the things a person believes in. Most Christians depend on supernatural standards and moral decisions (Cohen, 2018). Society considers the reasons, facts, and science as the sources of truth, making them the source of standards for moral decisions. To find the truth, a Christian should consider two questions: what is the best thing for humanity, or what would Jesus do? Individuals can find the truth if they can smell it, touch it, hear it, taste it, or test it (Cohen, 2018). There is also an application of feelings as a standard of decision-making or popular opinion, which seems right since everybody is involved.
Deductive and inductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoning can be used to get close to the truth, although proving truth can be difficult. Facts and logic are used in inductive reasoning. Bayesian updating, an approach applied to alter the hypothesis’ likelihood of being true as new proof arises, is also involved in inductive reasoning. In deductive reasoning, there is the main statement first, the minor statement, and finally a conclusion (Anderson et al., 2017). The conclusion is black and white, and it cannot be partly false or partly true. The first step is formulating a hypothesis which is then supported with evidence. The truth in the deductive statement can be decided by assessing the strength of the relationship between the conclusion and the premises (Anderson et al., 2017). Where broad conclusions are drawn when handling certain observations, inductive reasoning can be applied. The hypothesis will be supported if tangible patterns exist within the data.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Anderson, C. J., Mueller, E. A., & Schneider, A. C. (2017). Heroically Protecting Our Arguments: Using Superheroes to Teach Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Discourse: The Journal of the SCASD , 4 (1), 8.
Cohen, M. R. (2018). A Preface to Logic (1946) . Routledge .
