The three paraphrases have conspicuousdifferences, and the application of the Walden University on plagiarism can help in identifying the various academic shortcomings that the students committed. Overall, student B’s paraphrase stands out since it adheres to the basic writing rules regarding plagiarism and paraphrasing. First, the student desists from using the exact words of the author and replaces them with his own words without losing the meaning of the paragraph. Furthermore, the student acknowledges the source of the text by using a standard citation. He uses the APA citing method that involves indicating the surname of the author(s) and the year of publication.
There are several rules of plagiarism and paraphrasing that student A committed. First, the student did not replace the words of the authors, and he copied them verbatim as they appear in the text. This, according to Walden University position on academic honesty represents intentional plagiarism(Walden University. (2017).Also, the learner failed to acknowledge the original author of the source, and this also amounts to intentional plagiarism.While paraphrasing, the Walden University policy is clear that students must use as minimal words as possible from the original text.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Student C also went against the ideals of paraphrasing. Although he acknowledges the source of the text by correctly citing the names of the authors, he thinly veils the authors’ work by introducing only a couple of new words. This, according to the Walden University Writing Policy is a form of intentional plagiarism (Walden University, 2017). By introducing the name of the authors’ names at the beginning of the paragraph, paraphrasing limits the exact number of words that can be used drawn directly from the text.
Reference
Walden University. (2017). ASC Success Strategies: Plagiarism. Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ASCsuccess/ASCplagiarism
