Most of the highlighted information is impactful in that it gives knowledge on how arguments can be changed to have positive instead of negative outcomes. Science can be used to evaluate arguments through observations, predictions and it has certain elements. Scientific evidence of argument evaluation includes conducting observations, thinking critically about the observations, generating hypotheses, and conducting experiments and tests based on the hypotheses. I learned that science is a strong form of argument, and most people believe that it stands outside the domain of argumentation as it deals with facts that have evidence.
The shocking information that I learned that left me surprised is the aspect of the feminist argument, which can end in a mutual satisfaction of the argument if the participants get to a mutually satisfying resolution. Deep conflicts such as terrorist attacks can be resolved through feminism as t provides a way of interpreting radical actions that enhance better understanding and effective response to such conflicts. I learned that all arguments, despite their differences, are grounded in a social constructionist orientation that views human realities as a result of social interactions. Another surprising piece of information is that feminism argument can encourage individuals who engage in an argument to develop better modes of communication that can prevent the argument from ending up in violence.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Information about the alternative dispute resolution process was impactful because I understand the three parts of ADR: arbitration, mediation, and negotiation. A variety of reasons that push conflict parties to negotiate include gaining recognition about their legitimate issues, obtaining more information about the issues at hand, changing their perception and the perception of others, and restoring the good relationships that existed before the conflict. Certain factors that can make people withdraw from negotiation include the lack of interdependence with other parties, lack of urgency, and negative emotions about the other party.
Discussion Question
Is a clash in political positions and conflicts part of a democratic process?
Application
Dialogue can be applied to resolve conflicts among two countries that have issues such as terrorism at their borders.
