A systematic literature review in psychology can be applied in evidence integration into the practice. Systematically reviewed literature is not only confined to medicine and health sciences, but it can also be used in other fields like psychology where data is collected, published in the literature, synthesized, and assessed for methodological quality to define the subject accurately. Systematic reviews frequently apply quantitative techniques and employ a meta-analysis from a combination of results from a collection of suitable research evidence in developing Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). Though numerous systematic review studies hinge on specific statistical meta-analyses of eligible data, correspondingly, some qualitative reviews comply with the standards of collection, evaluation, and reporting evidence. EBP in psychology has been achieved by comparing the treatment plans and program intervention with evidence on effectiveness, to seek and accomplish the centered clinical outcomes. It is, therefore, extremely crucial to ensure that training of psychologists in the public health sector to acquire literacy skills and research ability to implement the EBP principles.
A Good Example of a Systematic Literature Review
Beel, N., Jeffries, C., Brownlow, C., Winterbotham, S., & Du Preez, J. (2018). Recommendations for male-friendly individual counseling with men: A qualitative systematic literature review for the period 1995–2016. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(4), 600. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-40751-001
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The journal article above is an excellent example of a systematic literature review on the effect of men's masculinity on their psychological wellbeing, readiness to get assistance, and their therapy experience. This article utilized numerous eligible systematically reviewed 44 sources on male-friendly therapy intervention written across the span of 21-years with the primary theme category of qualitative methodology. Other secondary themes included in the study were understanding socialization and men's masculinity, psychotherapist commitment and critical self-evaluation, masculinity-informed treatment interventions, and men's gender-informed roles and objectives.
