Sax, D. F., Early, R., & Bellemare, J. (2013). Niche syndromes, species extinction risks, and management under climate change. Trends in ecology & evolution, 28(9), 517-523.
This paper seeks to assess the ability of species to cope with climate change and survive under various circumstances. These circumstances include those pre-existing past the current spread out areas. They include a change in the risk of extinction, time set-backs in dealing with these risks and how best to utilize other existing management options. After the assessment, the paper suggests that a proposed framework of conception within whose ambits, empirical data could be applied to arrive at a conclusion about the newly discovered, important and accommodative home environment within the habitat of the species. Despite the fact that these components about the home environments have hardly been accorded any characteristics across a geographic measure, this idea is workable and applicable to numerous plant species if a comparison between traditional, those acquired by naturalization and horticultural distributions are done.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Harte, J., & Kitzes, J. (2012). The use and misuse of species-area relationships in predicting climate-driven extinction. In Saving a Million Species (pp. 73-86). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.
This article applies the idea of species-area relationships to predict the risks that predispose it to extinction. It also proceeds to point out the numerous conceptual framework problems associated with the approach. It proposes a new theory. The Maximum Entropy theory is suggested as an alternative to the SAR theory. The whole approach the paper gives is novel. It is, however, my submission that no single approach is fully perfect hence the need to address and embrace both approaches an attempt to find ways of filling in for their flaws.
Urban, M. C. (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348(6234), 571-573.
The paper puts a strong focus on the International Convention of the United Nations List of assessment methods. It points out that the list can actually pinpoint vulnerable species likely to be extinct as a result of climate change. It, however, suggests that the assessment method is not wholesome and that these very species ought to be addressed more regularly and more completely. In order to prevent extinction, conservation and adaptation mechanisms should then be swiftly assessed. The solution the article puts forward is quite plausible. I fully concur with the idea of conservation and adaptation as it strengthens species for future survival.
Akçakaya, H. R., Butchart, S. H., Watson, J. E., & Pearson, R. G. (2014). Preventing species extinctions resulting from climate change. Nature Climate Change, 4(12), 1048.
This paper also focuses on the IUCN List assessment method. It addresses how vulnerable species can be identified. If this is done, then it can help conserve animals. It mainly focuses on the idea of the swift response to saving species. The whole idea of a speedy response makes so much sense as it means species are saved as early as they are identified to be vulnerable.
Costello, M. J., May, R. M., & Stork, N. E. (2013). Can we name Earth's species before they go extinct? science, 339(6118), 413-416.
The article addresses the concern around the idea that there still exist numerous unnamed and undiscovered species. It expresses the concern of a fast-paced climate change action. This is likely to result in the extinction of some of these unknown species which is a detriment to science. The paper, therefore, champions aggressive research in order to ensure as many undiscovered species end up known before they go extinct. This I must admit is a very interesting concept and approach to the whole idea. The concerns are valid and it is a sure reason for stakeholders to promote research.
