Animals play a very fundamental role in the terrestrial ecosystem, including the provision of food, companionship, labor, and as a means of transport. They cohabit the terrestrial and marine environments with humans and thus play a dominant role in the sustainability of the planet. Based on this fact, they deserve not only the respect of human beings but also their welfare must be well protected by the law to prevent any form of abuse, mistreatment, or unnecessary torture such as testing (Park & Valentino, 2019). Animal testing has a severely detrimental impact on their health, while other, more ethical alternatives exist; therefore, it is important to ban the process.
Banning animal testing will help to protect them from testing procedures that make vulnerable to risks such as death and infection contrary to animal rights law. While some testing procedures follow procedures, animal welfare groups survey indicate that most scientific research entities do not follow these rules because of biased perceptions of dominance over animals (De Cássia Maria Garcia et al., 2018). Legal preventing of the practice will help to minimize the exposure of animals to these unnecessary risks. Preservation of the life of animals is immense to the suitability of the planet, thus banning the practice goes a long towards achieving this goal.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Reports of animal mistreatment during testing are saddening and no way justifiable. For example, some animals have suffered permanent disability as a result of human errors during testing processes. In severe cases, even death due to exposure to very toxic substances (Freires et al., 2016). Most scientists violate the set rules because of the lack of monitoring processes. The ethical alternatives should apply in the testing and animals left to their roles in society.
To conclude, banning animal testing will help to protect them from high-risk tests procedures that threaten their survival and also ensure they are not subject to mistreatment. Arguably, they are at the center of the continuity of man and, through the decisive action, prevent any outcome that may result in scientific abnormalities such as mutations that are irreversible.
References
De Cássia Maria Garcia, R., Jukes, N., Bones, V., Gebara, R., De Almeida Souza, M. F., Ruiz, V. R., Alonso, L., Tréz, T., Oliveira, S. T., Rocha, A. A., Alves, G., Paixão, R. L., Menezes, R. D., Dias, C., Andersen, M. L., Gasparetto, D., Capilé, K., Matera, J. M., & Bachinski, R. (2018). Brazil starts to ban animal use in higher education: A positive and progressive development. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals , 46 (4), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291804600402
Freires, I. A., Sardi, J. D., De Castro, R. D., & Rosalen, P. L. (2016). Alternative animal and non-animal models for drug discovery and development: Bonus or burden? Pharmaceutical Research , 34 (4), 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-2069-z
Park, Y. S., & Valentino, B. (2019). Animals are people too: Explaining variation in respect for animal rights. Human Rights Quarterly , 41 (1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0002
