Both scholarly and non-scholarly sources on suicide are different in terms of content, professionalism, credibility, and authorship among others. McLoughlin, Gould & Malone (2015) differs from Brueck (2018) in the sense that, the former has credibility owing to the cited authoritative sources used, while the latter has thrown around statistics, which are not backed by authoritative sources. In that sense, a reader or an audience interested in correct and credible information on suicide will obviously prefer McLoughlin, Gould & Malone (2015). In short, scholarly and non-scholarly sources are different if credibility is anything to consider.
Professionalism and content is a key element in sources. For instance, Bailey et al. (2011) is a scholarly article written by scholars, who are professionals in the field of psychiatry. In addition, the content provided in the source is well researched, it demonstrates specialized vocabularies, and aims at communicating at academicians or scholars. In contrast, Cornwell (2017) is a piece of newspaper, and the author is not an authority in mental health. He is a professional writer or a journalist affiliated to The Seattle Times. The article targets the general audience, and is intended to serve as an opinion source. In short, while scholarly articles are professionally researched, non-scholarly articles are simply write-ups by professional writers, and in most cases are opinionated.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A keen look at Bearman & Moody (2004) indicates the journal source is peer reviewed by other scholars, besides being affiliated to a credible institution. Furthermore, the source is successively numbered, an indication that it is a buildup of an on-going research. In view of the O'Donnell & Saker (2018) source, it lacks successive numbers, a clear indication that it does not acknowledge that research has been ongoing regarding the suicide issue. The source is most likely available in entertainment joints, and cannot be found in libraries of colleges and universities. Notably, it is not affiliated to an institution known for conducting research on matters health. In short, scholarly sources are continuation of previous research, while non-scholarly sources do not indicate an ongoing conversation regarding the issue at hand.
References
Scholarly sources
McLoughlin, A. B., Gould, M. S. & Malone, K. M. (2015). Global trends in teenage suicide: 2003–2014. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine , Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages 765–780
Bailey, R. K. et al. (2011). Suicide: Current Trends. Journal of the National Medical Association. Volume 103, Issue 7, Pages 614-617
Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004). Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. American journal of public health , 94(1), 89-95.
Non-scholarly sources
Brueck, H. (2018). The US suicide rate has increased 30% since 2000, and tripled for young girls. Here's what we can do about it. Retrieved from < https://www.pulselive.co.ke/bi/tech/the-us-suicide-rate-has-increased-30-since- 2000-and-tripled-for-young-girls-heres-what-we-can-do-about-it-id8836472.html>
Cornwell, P. (2017). Rate of suicide among teen girls reaches 40-year high. Retrieved from < https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/rate-of-suicide-among-teen-girls- reaches-40-year-high/>
O'Donnell, J. & Saker, A. (2018). Teen suicide is soaring. Do spotty mental health and addiction treatment share blame? Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/03/19/teen-suicide-soaring-do- spotty-mental-health-and-addiction-treatment-share-blame/428148002/
