The supervision feedback videos involve sessions of cooperation between the supervisors and supervisees to provide feedback on performance. In all the videos, the interactions include a communication from the supervisor on the critical aspect that concerned the performance of the supervisee in their responsibility. Secondly, all the videos portray the supervisee as an attentive and committed individual that focuses on understanding factors related to their duties in a bid to improve on performance. In overall, all the videos presented a positive interaction between the supervisor and the supervisee, which involved a review of different aspects concerning performance.
The ratio of Praise to Constructive Statements in Each Video
Maintaining an ideal rate of praise and the constructive statement is necessary towards enhancing the individual level of performance (Davys & Beddoe, 2010). In supervision, approval and valuable statements have a significant role in improving the performance of the supervisee, which is an aspect that acts as a motivation factor. In the first video of supervision, ration of praise to the constructive statement is high as the supervisor commends the supervisee on the excellent work done. On the second supervision feedback video, the ratio of praise to constrictive video is relatively lower than in the first video. In this video, the supervisor focuses more on the constructive statement regarding what could be done to improve and does not focus more on praise. In the third video, the supervisor does not praise the supervisee and only engage in criticism, which focused on the things that were not accomplished.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Best Practices Related to Supervision Feedback
The best practices related to supervision feedback capitalize on enhancing performance and encourage engagement in specific duties and responsibilities. The first best practice that refers to supervision feedback entails encouraging open and professional communication between the supervisor and the supervisee (Jones, 2016). Secondly, it is essential to ask questions n a bid to enhance understanding and maximize individual productivity. Additionally, it is essential to provide a final evaluation as part of giving feedback as it is a best practice that helps in enhancing supervision feedback.
How Videos Compared to Best Practice Techniques
Based on the observation made on the videos, some comparisons can be noted concerning best practice techniques. According to the best practice techniques, it is essential to capitalize on enhancing a positive reinforcement by creating a balance between the positive and negative statements made during a supervision feedback session. In the first video, the supervisor maintained an ideal ratio that capitalizes on positive aspects compared to the harmful elements, which is an aspect that compares to the best practice techniques in supervision. Based on Daniel’s 4.1 ratios, best practice techniques in supervision focuses on ensuring that positive comments out the negative comments in any feedback session (Beckman, Forsberg, Lindqvist, & Ghaderi, 2019).
What Worked Well in the Interactions
A review of the feedback videos indicates different kinds of interaction that was depicted by the supervisor and the supervisee. What worked well in the interactions is the fact that the supervisor engaged in open communication with the supervisee, especially on the first and second video. In this case, the supervisor and the supervisee involved in the form of communication, allowing for a discussion on critical aspects that would be necessary for enhancing positive performance. Additionally, the element of praise acted as a motivating factor for the supervisee, which is an aspect that worked well for the interactions. Lastly, the fact that the supervisee engaged the supervisor in asking a question on what could be done to improve worked well for the interactions.
What Did Not Work Well in The Interactions
The first aspect that did not work well in the interactions entails the fact that the supervisor focused on her phone on the third video, which is an aspect that did not portray professionalism in the feedback session. Additionally, the fact that the supervisor did not provide them with any positive feedback in the third video did not work well with the interactions, thereby leading to a very brief session. Additionally, the lack of specificity in the second video did not work well for the interactions considering that it is essential to focus on specific aspects in a bid to understand areas that require improvements.
Which Video do You Believe Would be Most Likely to Improve The Supervisee's Performance?
The video that I believe would be most likely to improve the performance of the supervisee is the first video. The primary reason relating to my thinking is on the fact that the video observed the best practice techniques that essential for supervision feedback. In that case, the video capitalized on the aspect of praise to constructive statements which were depicted in the response provided by the supervisor mentioning that she was happy with the work undertaken by the supervisee. Secondly, the fact that there was open and friendly communication is an indicator that the supervisee would be comfortable with interacting with the supervisor on aspects that concerned asking questions and making any form of consultation. Additionally, the supervisor provided a room for interaction, mentioning that she was happy interacting with the supervisee and that she welcomes any input that may be available.
References
Beckman, M., Forsberg, L., Lindqvist, H., & Ghaderi, A. (2019). Providing objective feedback in supervision in motivational interviewing: results from a randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy , 1-12.
Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions . Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Jones, M. (2016). Supervision, learning and transformative practices. In Social work, critical reflection and the learning organization (pp. 21-32). Routledge.
