Psychological assessment contributes vital information to comprehending a person's traits and abilities via the gathering, integration, and understanding of data about a person. Psychologists should perceive various critical ethical and professional contemplations when dealing with psychological tests (Lamiell, 2019). Testing tends to impact examinees' lives in multiple means, from licensing assessments, screening for certain professions to custody appraisals and proficiency to be executed. Application of desirable ethical practices in the scope of testing replicates noble medical practice. Test data, test security, consent confidentiality, test construction, and obsolete tests are some of the test misuse topics (Wright, 2016). The possible adverse effects of tests occur in various ways, and these effects have an adverse impact on the person being tested and the general public.
The appropriate usage of norm-referenced tests in testing comprises a chain of verdicts and activities on the speech-language clinician fragment. According to Daugherty et al. (2016), cultural biases is one of the negative effects of test result when there are no precise or accurate tests for individuals who use another language other than the commonly used English. In the United States, psychological test appliances are usually standardized in English. Such indicates that uncertainty is likely to happen even if translated into other languages due to the original meaning's change. The tests also limit validity for kids from diverse cultural or economic backgrounds.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The use of one test to make decisions limits diversification and inclusion of ideas. The misuse of tests happens when absolute results are not considered and deducted from the full perspective of the several elements that characterize examinees (Frielink, Schuengel, & Embregts, 2018). A sample extracted from a limited domain does not necessarily impact the influence of the outcome. Lack of understanding of the test assessment creates disparities and leads to psychologists making irrelevant and ambiguous decisions. Inclusivity is essential in acquiring accurate and precise data.
References
Daugherty, J. C., Puente, A. E., Fasfous, A. F., Hidalgo-Ruzzante, N., & Pérez-Garcia, M. (2016). Diagnostic mistakes of culturally diverse individuals when using North American neuropsychological tests. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult , 24 (1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1036992
Frielink, N., Schuengel, C., & Embregts, P. J. (2018). Autonomy support, need satisfaction, and motivation for support among adults with intellectual disability: Testing a self-determination theory model. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities , 123 (1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.1.33
Lamiell, J. T. (2019). Psychology’s misuse of statistics and persistent dismissal of its critics . Springer.
Wright, C. V. (2016). Assessment practices of professional psychologists: Results of a national survey. PsycEXTRA Dataset . https://doi.org/10.1037/e504422016-001
