The art of according pure reason to the events that surround the environments of humanity attracted the attention of many thinkers in the 18th century. Philosophers and free thinkers explored the various parameter that human uses to assign meaning and reason to the events that characterize human life. Philosophers have attempted to establish the connection between the cognitive nature of humanity and the good use of reason. Through his writing titled "The Transcendental Doctrine of Method: The canon of pure reason", Emmanuel Kant succeeds in relating the human cognitive ability with the use of pure reason. Through the various canons described by Kant in the document stated above, the reason is depicted as the product of the cognitive perception of the interpreter.
Summary of "The canon of pure reason" by Emmanuel Kant
The document begins by relating the cognitive aspect of human and its influence in the assigning pure reason. The author introduces the canons by giving an oversight that the entire document shall revolve around the practical use of reason and not the speculative (Kant, 2007). In the first canon of pure reason, Emmanuel Kant explains the ultimate impacts of the use of pure reason. Kant explains that good use of pure reason leads to knowing other than speculating.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The document continues in the preceding canon to highlight the ultimate grounds of determining the use of pure reason. The author explains that the parameters to be used in gauging one's application of pure reason should be grounded on the highest good (Kant, 2007). The document concludes by comparing the application reason versus opinion, knowing and believing. Kant argues that an individual believes an occurrence is true based on objective grounds. Kant explains that merging genuine and real reason in forming opinions, knowledge and believe results in conviction and persuasion.
A personal reflection on Emmanuel Kant arguments in "The canon of pure reason"
Emmanuel Kant's argument is credibly valid in establishing that the exercise of assigning pure reason is a cognitive practice. However, Kant prudently warns that human cognitive approaches could at times be objective and not subjective. I laud Emmanuel Kant for presenting the positive impacts of the pure use of reason. Kant successfully depicts that knowledge and happiness are a result of the practical application of pure and pragmatic.
I find Kant being objective in his argument that pure reason should be grounded on the highest good. The parameter of gauging the use of reason should be guided by the best benefit from the scenario. The author also warns that objectivity should not be used to compromise reason. The author is sensitive in highlighting that pragmatism in defining the highest good should be appreciated (Kant, 2007). Emmanuel Kant argues that the use of pure reason achieves happiness and self-satisfaction. According to the arguments of the author, self-satisfaction and happiness are arrived at after a pragmatic determination of the highest good in any scenario. The author credibly ties up conviction and persuasion as products of pure reason. The author argues that discerning speculation and applying practical relation of objective reason leads to the achievement conviction and persuasion.
The reason is, therefore, is been presented as a product of cognitive exercise in human beings. The use of pure reason is achieved after the objective organization of one's cognitive practice. The author of the document warns against the use of speculative reason. The speculative reason is miss-leading since the cognitive efforts pursued in arriving at the reason are always subjective. I laud the author's argument that pure reason should be grounded on the highest good in any scenario. The use of pure reason objectively leads to the achievement of conviction and persuasion in any scenario.
Reference
Kant, E. (n.d). The Transcendental Doctrine of Method second Chapter: The canon of pure reason; 672-690.
