The need to crusade the contribution of the humankind to enhancing net neutrality has often been in the limelight of Facebook Inc. operations. Since the beginning of the partnership fostered by countless technological companies across the globe, issues have continued to arise with the support rendered to social media by various governments ( Deresky, 2017) . Advocating for the course of the World Wide Web for economic enhancement has ensured that crucial markets have been presented by numerous developing countries such as India. Although the benefits of the World Wide Web has been pointed out severally by researchers and organization alike, it is discernible that the ignorance of the principle of potential gateways will remain a critical concept in the delivery of a humanitarian network for all.
Question 1: Outline of Facebook’s Internet.org
The objective of Facebook’s Internet.org is to ensure that access to internet connection is available to more than two-thirds of the global population yet to be connected. Furthermore, the opportunities expressed by the organization are projected to enhance connectivity to people of the third world countries who lack access to critical information sources, for example, India and other first-growing economies in the sub-Saharan Africa ( Deresky, 2017) . As an initiative covering multiple countries across the globe, Internet.org has attracted contributions from global leaders including experts, local community elders, not-for-profit organizations, and technology leaders. The experts charged with the mandate of controlling Internet.org have indicated that a significant proportion of the global population still lacks sufficient access to internet connections.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Question 2: Impact of Internet.org on Growing Economies
The organization’s mission statement highlight that the company is concerned with offering the power to share and make the globe a more connected and open world. In this regard, connectivity in the first-growing economies of the world such as India will continue to elicit concerns about net neutrality overall. Organizations such as the Internet.org have introduced initiatives such as Social EDU to provide Rwandan students with unlimited free access to online libraries and learning materials in rural areas across the country ( Deresky, 2017) . Additionally, the contributions of net neutrality to educational development in rural regions have enhanced the creation of collaboration between non-governmental organizations and providers of free educational care to students in the local areas.
Regarding the access to interconnectivity for developing economies, the CEO of Facebook expressed his concerns about business movements in line with economic needs. Fundamentally, Zuckerberg indicated that Facebook will settle on the type of internet governance it desires for access to a global health system. Through Facebook, families will access their health records miles away ( Deresky, 2017) . Although the barriers to internet connectivity through organizations such as Internet.org will be numerous, it is noteworthy that the outcomes will reflect the overall demand of connectedness among global populations, especially in the developing worlds.
The desire for global access to internet connections has been outlined by various scholars and case studies. However, countless barriers have contributed to the distribution degree of connections. Some of the critical concerns linked with limited access to connectivity include, among others, inability of networks to support large data amounts, limited availability of power sources, limited awareness of internet value among learned individuals, content levels in local languages, compromised and expensive service plans, and expensive devices ( Lüthje, Hürtgen, Pawlicki, & Sproll, 2013) .
The missions outlined by the organization regarding growing economies have often focused on the need to avoid monetary gains for overall connectivity for every individual across the globe. According to the company founder, conventional businesses have perceived people as using interconnectivity services without making money at considerable costs. Zuckerberg indicated his emphasis on making profits in the long term, with him acknowledging that companies such as Coca-Cola have invested in huge markets for decades ( Deresky, 2017) . The CEO posits that internet connectivity could be similar to the feats of Coca-Cola, although the path seems oblique about profitability in both the short and long-term.
Question 3: Facebook’s Expansion or Bottom-line in the Pyramid
The case study indicates that Facebook Inc. has faced diverse humanitarian concerns concerning net neutrality. The CEO, Zuckerberg, for instance, has expressed his ideas about the need for a better opportunity growth for developing economies such as India. The need for sporadic economic developments ensured that scathing remarks always characterized the creation of monopoly portals as well as ignorance about the concept of net neutrality. Establishment of the “venture humanitarianism” by Facebook has been considered as an attempt to get more consumers to boost the organization’s bottom-line for prospective growth.
Amid the decline in the humanitarian concerns highlighted by Facebook overtime, it has become interesting to reconsider initiatives that would altruistically produce the promise of a networked world with the assurance of economic prosperity. Economic prospects have not delivered the required economic outcomes over the years; thus, the need for a re-examination of organizational values to understand the fortunes of bottom-up pyramid adopted by Facebook and other social media organizations.
Criticisms have always developed because of the ineffective definition of the objectives of Internet.org from the company’s main cornerstone. According to the case, Zuckerberg has always framed the organizations as a humanitarian and non-profit aid form of mission ( Deresky, 2017) . Scathing criticism and remarks, however, have been raised about the statement of enabling interconnectivity as a fundamental human right. Various critics have classified Internt.org as an initiative that provides a gateway to a global drug supply chain. Other key personnel in the connectivity endeavor such a Bill Gates expressed their concerns about ensuring interconnectivity without considering other crucial aspects of life such Malaria vaccine.
Internet.org is not a pyramid scheme because the stated objectives will be obtained in the long-term. Several other humanitarian organizations have argued that tech companies operating in the Silicon Valley have earlier been linked to venturing into areas outside their frameworks. As a result, consistent promotion of illegitimate organizations has developed over time, including app-fueled destruction of feasible organizational activities for companies in both the developed and developing countries ( Lüthje et al., 2013) . Regarded by opponents as active venture humanitarianism, organizations such as Internet.org, as well as other countless business and non-profit organizations, have enforced people to believe that the internet and technology industry will solve their concerns, especially companies and individuals in the developing worlds. Internt.org has focused on solving connectivity problems associated with entrepreneurs via models enhanced by apps applications to countries such as Tanzania, Paraguay, and Philippines.
Concerning the development of the network of things over time, it is arguable that the goals of Internet.org are not aligned with the rampant pyramid schemes reported in Silicon Valley. The company’s CEO clarified that one of the most critical initiatives of the organization is to indicate to people the reasons for its rationality so they may spend the little for foreseeable outcomes in the long-term ( Deresky, 2017) . The initiative of Internt.org will never be on the ramp because the need for connectivity has never become more pronounced than the new environment in which all businesses processes depend the World Wide Web for communications and consistency in delivery of goods.
Conclusion
The feasibility and reach of Internet.org will continue to proliferate because of diverse reasons. Firstly, it is not only Facebook that has highlighted the demand for influencing consumers of the internet to access news, entertainment, and development information, but also other developers in Silicon Valley. Several organizations in the Valley have been linked with pyramid schemes, but the ability of Facebook’s Internet.org will proliferate because the intentions of the organization’s feasibility are in the long-term. The programs created by Internet.org have influenced people in the third-world nations about their position to access banking, health, and educational activities online. As a result, the objective of Internet.org will always reflect the need for connectivity upon which it was created. Issues about pyramid schemes in Silicon Valley will always emerge, but the focus of robust organizational programs focusing on long-term profits will remain supreme to unforeseeable projects that focus on earnings in the short-term.
Criticisms will always arise when organizations in the Silicon Valley discuss plans to exhibit optional connectivity plans for the developing countries. Organizations in the Valley have lobbied and manipulated serious connectivity topics to ensure that reforms are performing in the liberalization and privatization of the World Wide Web to enhance the commercial interests of the third-world countries. Because of the projected long-term outcomes of Internet.org and the growth in fast-developing nations such as India, it is expected that the cards played by Facebook will ensure connectivity for the people as well as profitability for the company overall.
References
Deresky, H. (2017). International management: Managing across borders and cultures . Pearson Education India.
Lüthje, B., Hürtgen, S., Pawlicki, P., & Sproll, M. (2013). From Silicon Valley to Shenzhen: global production and work in the IT industry . Rowman & Littlefield.
