The developmental approach to monitoring got based on two assumptions. The first one is that as a person develops competence and skills when he or she is a counsellor, one moves from one stage to another. The other assumption is that the series of a scene that one runs from requires different techniques and supervision skills. Smith said that in this approach a person starts from a novice stage then ends up being an expert (2009). Supervisees at the early stage as a counsellor are expected to possess less confidence and limited skills. The supervisees at the middle stage should have more faith than the beginner, and he or she should maintain conflicting confidence when seeing the supervisor’s dependence or independence. The expert level supervisees should be reflective on the issues touching the supervisory processes, counselling and expected to have the best skills in solving problems (Smith, 2009). The approach is suitable for both individual and group supervision.
I find the developmental model to be the best supervision model since the stages of supervision sharpen a person, and when the person reaches the top level, the leadership qualities that are expected from one is the best. Also, the model of supervision not only beneficial to the supervisee but also the interaction between the supervisee and the supervisor fosters the best critical thinking development that is essential in leadership (Smith, 2009). The developmental model stands as the best approach but it as a weakness. The process seems to be linear, but it has some challenges. The supervisee in this model can be in several stages simultaneously. For example, a middle-level supervisee may be having high anxiety whenever facing a new client situation. Generally, the model is the best.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Smith, K. (2019). Supervision methods. Journal Of Counselling Psychology, 43(1), 1-7. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/7016360-Supervision-methods-by-kendra-smith-phd-lpc-acs.html
