After successful completion of the test, I secured a place among the many 25 percent who partook in the process. With a strong automatic preference for straight people over gay people, I feel somewhat cheated, given my assured warmness for all people, regardless of their sexuality. Therefore, I somewhat doubt the entire validity of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) in revealing hidden, automatic, stereotypes, and prejudices that define conscious control. However, I understand that I may be biased and therefore accept the results as accurate. My chosen study is with regards to Sexuality, a topic that is quite controversial. I always try to practice impartiality as a straight person according to all persons with the respect they deserve. Nonetheless, I welcome the opinion that I have a slight bias against gay people with an open attitude, alive to the fact that there are specific attributes displayed by gay people that I dissent.
I think that it may be difficult for one to describe their own bias. Nonetheless, my bias has little to no influence on my behavior. Simply, I subscribe to a philosophy that believes all men must be treated with utmost respect and dignity, as is their given right. Therefore, matters such as gender, race, age, sexuality, and religion should never dictate how individuals are treated. However, I have a recollection of the few instances I have felt disgusted by different sexualities. In as much as I have no conflict with the individual’s sexuality, I find it insensitive for a sane soul to try and impose their beliefs on others. Similarly, I find it inappropriate that one would assume that the treatment they received was informed by their sexuality, and therefore the need to defend.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Also, I find this exercise appealing and beneficial to the wholesome being of individuals. For instance, my knowledge of biases and preferences inform me further of the approaches that I need to take to avoid conflicting with others. Consequently, my understanding that I have an automatic preference for straight people over gay people is illuminating. Not only does the knowledge offer me additional insight about my bias, but it also supplies me with numerous options to explore my other capacities. For example, the knowledge that I tend to favor straight people over gay people should inform all of my decisions and deliberations when in proximity to gay people. Subsequently, I think that I need to shape my thinking and actions to reflect my beliefs. Most importantly, the knowledge will help me define the type of relationships I foster, to avoid creating scenarios that will compromise my happiness as well.
Unfortunately, the knowledge acquired with the realization that I have a strong automatic preference for straight people over gay people does not offer me a holistic understanding of the other groups. The social, behavioral study is a complex undertaking, which cannot be explicated in such a casual manner, similar to the one suggested by the Implicit Association Tests (IATs). The test only asks for opinions that seem apparent and uses narratives that bear less significance to the task. Corroborating to images and wordings with implications to sexual orientation cannot present an accurate overview of individuals’ biases. Also, the method is susceptible to errors, coupled with the fact that the accuracy of the feedback given by respondents depends on the swiftness of their learning of the items to be queried. Alternatively, I suggest appropriate adjustments to the methodology as follows. Images and symbols portraying sexual orientation should be defined, wordings should be used in statements, as opposed to listings, and more time should be allocated to allow individuals more time to think and rationalize.
