Several items cause pollution in the environment and controlling them will lower their effects on the ecosystem. Pollution prevention methods can be applied to activities that are more likely to cause or cause this problem. Several federal bodies exist to govern various sectors that cause pollution in the environment, and various sectors should abide by the regulations the federations set. Therefore, implementing cost-effective pollution prevention effects on various materials or energy lead to a significant gain in environmental benefit.
Noise is a material that causes pollution in the environment. Domestic, industrial, constructional, and traffic sources primarily cause noise pollution. Noise pollution causes health effects such as psychological stress, irritation, nervous exhaustion, eardrum sensitivity, and in extreme cases, deafness (Olaosun, Ogundiran & Tobih, 2009). Population increase in urban centers mainly causes congestion which in turn leads to noise. There is a need to reduce noise pollution in the environment to reduce the health effects it has on the population. The Noise Control Act which was passed in 1972 is applicable in controlling noise. Agricultural activities can cause pollution in the environment; hence a need to implement approaches to help in reducing it. Several approaches can be used in this sector, and one includes minimal use of water and chemicals (Voulvoulis & Georges, 2016). Secondly, the sector can adopt the use of less environmentally harmful pesticides to aid in the elimination of pests that are more likely to affect crops. These pollution prevention strategies will create more benefits in this sector. The laws that govern this sector are Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) of 2002 which sets pesticide limit in foods and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) of 1996 which regulates sale distribution of pesticides. Regulation of the use of pesticides will lower wastes resulting from agricultural activities. Pollution prevention in the mining sector is also essential. During the mining process of natural resources such as metal, several pollutants are released into the environment. Furthermore, solid materials such as rocks are also exploited from the ground, and if not properly disposed of, can lead to pollution (Voulvoulis & Georges, 2016). However, companies in the mining industry can adapt to the use of various technologies to prevent the emission of substances. The law that applies to this sector is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was passed in 1976 and implemented in 1986 with the primary aim of tracing waste from foundations. The RCRA also addresses solid wastes and landfills. Mining companies are expected to properly dispose of solid wastes and ensure that their material process flow provides means of how hazardous materials are identified, collected, stored, and labeled. Industrial wastes also cause pollution in the environment, and these mainly result from manufacturing activities. In most situations, manufacturing processes lead to the production of soluble poisonous heavy metal elements (Voulvoulis & Georges, 2016). With time, these wastes accumulate along the food chain and can cause death if their concentration is high. Firms should modify the production process and reuse materials instead of disposing of them. The law that applies to this sector is the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) which was passed in 1976 to regulate chemicals during the manufacturing process. Manufacturers should comply with regulations that apply to the appropriate disposal of waste materials and hazardous chemicals. In conclusion, various elements cause pollution in the environment during different activities such as domestic, agricultural, and industrial processes. There is a need to address these pollutants and the effects on the environment and devise ways to eliminate them. Various laws and regulations govern the disposal of wastes as well as the management of pollutants in the reduction and prevention of pollution. Therefore, implementing minimal cost pollution prevention practices lead to significant environmental benefits.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Olaosun, A. O., Ogundiran, O., & Tobih, J. E. (2009). Health hazards of noise: a review article. Research Journal of Medical Sciences , 3 (3), 115-122.
Voulvoulis, N., & Georges, K. (2016). Industrial and agricultural sources and pathways of aquatic pollution. In Impact of water pollution on human health and environmental sustainability (pp. 29-54).
