The future of public administration is dependent on how well organizations will embrace flexibility, innovation, and change. The reason why this assertion is acceptable is the fact that the world is changing at unprecedented rates, meaning the structures and approaches that worked ten years ago will not work in the coming ten years. In this case, there is a need for public administrators to review organizational goals so that they are aligned to innovation and client-center products and services. A review and critique of various articles on public administration is a good place to understand the dynamics in this field that will shape its future.
Statement and Discussion of the Articles Theses
The three articles revolve around different aspects and concepts of public administration. Toward a new public administration by Frederickson establishes that there is a need to anticipate a new understanding in the field of public administration. The thesis statement in this article indicates that public administrators must adopt a new form of thinking that advances social equity. This thesis statement is crucial since it establishes the need for the adoption of approaches that enhance the economic well-being of minorities. The Proverbs of Administration by Simon (2016) advances the thesis that specialization in organizations contributes to administrative efficiency. This thesis is crucial since it emphasizes the need to change administrative approaches in the field of public finance to enhance sustainability and profitability. Organizations of the Future by Warren Bennis (2016) predicts a shift from bureaucratic organizational structures that have defined the public sector for a long. The thesis statement indicates that the public sector will readily adopt a social system model as it is best suited for the 21st-century industry needs. The statement is very important in the study of the public administration field as it emphasizes the need to adjust approaches, depending on the existing business environment.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The Future of Public Administration based on the Articles
These articles highlight crucial structures, components, and aspects that define the field of Public Administration. From the three articles, it is clear that this field is quite dynamic, meaning that there is a need to adjust viewpoints to enhance the sustainability of the public sector. Frederick (2016) asserts that a time has come to adopt new public administration that focuses on promoting the economic wellbeing of disadvantaged groups. The focus on social equity, considering the need for innovation to meet the changing needs of clients. Simon (2016) affirms the need for public administrators to find newer and practical strategies for achieving administrative efficiency in the dynamic business environment. The author establishes that the unpredictable field requires practical frameworks that would address various administrative issues in the future. On the other hand, Warren (2016) anticipates a significant change in the future organization which will move away from bureaucratic structures and instead adopts social systems. This shift in organizational structure is a response to rapid and unexpected change that will be part of the public administration landscape.
Ethical Dilemmas Arising in Public Administration based on My Vision
The field of public administration is prone to various ethical dilemmas in a bid to maintain a balance between enforcing policies while guaranteeing public wellbeing. Administrative discretion is an ethical dilemma, considering that public official not only executes policies but also make decisions about people’s lives (Cardenas & Ramirez, 2018). In this case, public administrators are required to use their discretion to ensure that the section of an alternative over others is rational. At times, public administrators rely on personal preferences or political affiliation to decide on the most suitable approach. This approach means that it is possible to misuse administrative discretion, while it is supposed to promote wellbeing (Cardenas & Ramirez, 2018). To this end, administrative discretion creates ethical dilemmas, especially if they cause more harm than good.
References
Bennis, W. (2016). Organizations of the future. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 219-229). Cengage Learning.
Cardenas, S., & Ramirez de la Cruz, E. E. (2017). Controlling administrative discretion promotes social equity? Evidence from a natural experiment. Public Administration Review, 77 (1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12590
Frederickson, H. G. (2016). Toward a new public administration. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 282-294). Cengage Learning.
Simon, H. A. (2016). The proverbs of administration. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 135-148). Cengage Learning.
