Art is a vital tool that reflects societal components. The different perceptions of an artwork by artists, curators, and the society in entirety contribute to transitions in styles, forms, color, and texture applied by artists. The 18 th Century artists regarded low art as pure decoration without aesthetic values. Also, they viewed high art as aesthetically challenging and exemplary, considering its perception and significance. There are different implications of blurring the lines between high and low art. Blurring the lines between low and high art contributes to a lack of perfect comprehension of the differences between the colors used in the art world. The black and white photographs and the colored create high-level confusion. The confusion arises in the process of an analysis of the meanings of the colors used and the aesthetic values. The distinction between the low and high art contributed to a perfect understanding between the appealing and unity aspect part of the art. The blurring aspect creates confusion between the two. The muddle will affect future artists since they will fail to identify the real functions of different paintings with diverse colors as painted by artists.
The blurring lines between low and high art also leads to an appreciation of both arts. A society that appreciates both low and high art will contribute to increased numbers of artists who apply their techniques with autonomy. Since the separation of the two led to fear of painting of artworks that are inclusive of the aesthetic and utility, the blurring lines have brought sanity in the art industry. Also, people perceive high art as a proper display tool, whereas low art as a mere form of entertainment. The change in their perception by bridging the gap between the two areas leads to the appreciation of every type of art without bias. Recognition of all artwork will contribute to the broad understanding of their importance. The society will, therefore, gain from the moral display of art and the pleasurable aspect due to its entertaining function. The blurring of lines between the low and high art will consequently contribute to different repercussions to artists, consumers, and the entire society.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Meaning Of Abjection, and my Feeling about Abject Art
Abjection refers to the feeling of distaste when the artist erred by applying private bodily images to describe the differences such as animate/inanimate, animal/human, and life or death. Abject art involves the referencing of body and bodily functions through images of female bodies to describe themes that threaten individuals' sense of purity. I feel a high level of disgust when I view or analyze abject art. According to moral standards, human bodies are pure and private. Exposure of the bodily parts and their functions to society through art is a high sense of moral decadence. For instance, Tale, by Kiki Smith (b.1954), is an example of an abject art that spells an abuse to the human body and its functions. Kiki Smith promotes moral decadence by displaying humanity as an impure being whose bodily functions, such as excretion is abuse to society. Since the image has a tail and four legs, separating it with an animal without consciousness is a difficult task. Abject threatens the perception of purity among humanity and their moral standards.
Abject art denounces the importance of women in society by relating them as objects of aestheticism and entertainment. The exposure of the privacy of women's gender is a disrespect. Although the renaissance artists applied such images, they were not too extreme as their presentation through abject art. The constant use of female metaphors in abject art intensifies patriarchy. They represent a society that does not appreciate men but uses them as pawns in the commercial centers. Women have suffered right from 1700 AD due to the philosophical perceptions that they lack rational abilities. I expect the present-day artists to paint arts that appreciate women and cures the pain they have experienced in a male-dominated society. That is not the case as per my perception. People still perceive feminine gender as vulnerable and use their bodily structures and parts as appeals and commercial purposes. It is quite surprising that artists who should appreciate women in perfect ways use their images as an aspect of impurity. The presentation of female bodies through abject art is abuse to the feminine gender.
The Second Wave Feminists
The second wave feminists mainly aimed at opposing the patriarchal cultural practices and institutions in the society. The society perceived Feminists as "old-fashioned," contributing to the increased cases of hate towards women. Since people recognized beauty as a component that defined women's value, second-wave feminists applied their bodily images and bodies to gain respect in the patriarchal society. It does not mean that they utilized their bodies immorally but used them as reference points to the importance of God's creation and the need for equality since God created everybody in His image. The second wave feminists applied the body images to demand respect and equal treatment from patriarchs.
Women perceived beauty as an ideal factor that they valued. However, the second wave feminists viewed women's concentration on beauty as a factor that contributed to their vulnerability. Since the period required women to gain confidence and strength to fight for their rights in a male-dominated society, their high expenses on clothes, fashion were prerequisites to their vulnerability. For instance, in her book, The Beauty Myth , Naomi Wolf, believed that women could act on self-improvement rather than social action. I am confident she perceived women as strong gender who should love themselves and avoid overspending on the fashions aiming to please the society that does not value their plights. The second-wave feminists therefore concentrated on their bodies to reveal to the community their worth and ability to realize a positive transition in a male-dominated society. They slightly achieved their aims since males perceived them differently.
