The Last Supper by Leonardo Da Vinci is one of the most iconic artworks that capture a religious activity in Christianity. The artwork is representative of Vinci’s artistic features that include sfumato to ensure that the painting is more realistic. As a result, one can make out various aspects of the painting and in this way relate with The Last Supper as described in the scriptures. A comparison of The Last Supper with my art production helps to highlight the connections between the two pieces in terms of background and techniques.
Focus on The Last Supper
The Last Supper w as created in 1498 by Leonardo da Vinci to celebrate the event that would culminate in the death of Jesus. The Italian polymath is considered one of the greatest painters owing to his incorporation of outstanding techniques. The drywall painting, which uses oil/tempera mix, appears very real meaning that one can make out the various aspects. Moreover, Leonardo adopted the sfumato technique by using dark glazes on the painting edges to soften other colors (Barnett, 2019). As a result, the edges appear as if they are obscured by smoke and in this way, the painting appears more. For instance, by using the technique, Leonardo focuses more attention on Judas who appears to be holding a purse in the shadows. Moreover, the painting adopts the vanishing point technique allows the viewer to focus on the characters' emotional reactions and psychological state.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Focus on Continuity
The title of my art production is Continuity since it depicts the rolling of the ocean and the sunshine as continuous events that do not stop. The production depicts that the sun, which is represented by concentric rings, is connected to the ocean and together they define humanity. Life, which is enhanced by the two natural phenomena, is also continuous and the production helps to encompass longevity and continuity.
The connection between The Last Supper and Continuity
The Last Supper and Continuity help the artists to express themselves and pass a crucial message to the intended audience. Their similarity seems to end at the fact that both of them are art forms, which use mediums and images. The two pieces are dissimilar in various aspects ranging from the theme, medium, form, and other formal elements. The Last Supper is a realistic painting that captures real aspects including the room, the characters, their interactions, and their surroundings (Mousavi, 2017). On the other hand, Continuity is more of an abstract artwork that uses shapes and lines, which means it can have more than one meaning. It may not be possible to establish what the painting is all about unless there is a description from the artist.
The two pieces differ by the medium used with The Last Supper being painted on a dry wall while Continuity is done on a piece of paper. The Last Supper uses the oil/tempera mix, which allows for the contrast of colors and in this way helps to create a more realistic, and lasting painting. On the other hand, Continuity uses paper and crayons which do not allow for contrasting texture and color, which makes it a simplistic artwork. The medium that is used to create a work of art plays a crucial role as it determines the viewer’s experience. Viewers tend to associate an artist’s strength based on the medium and the techniques that have been incorporated in the work of art. The Last Supper is more likely to appeal to more viewers as compared to the Continuity . The Last Supper is well-thought-out and the artist is more talented based on the quality of the painting and how real it is. Continuity may not appeal to many viewers as the use of paper and crayons to draw abstract forms does not indicate excellence and talent. Nonetheless, both pieces are artistic and demonstrate the artists’ ideas and artistic convictions.
References
Barnett, R. (2019). Leonardo da Vinci. The Lancet , 393(10179):1409-1410.
Mousavi R. M. H.(2017). Investigation of Da Vinci's The Last Supper inspiration origin on canonical gospels. Bagh-e Nazar Journal , 14 (46): 23-30.
