The thesis statement of the literature review indicates that the study focused on understanding the origin of human language. Furthermore, the information sought to explain how human language has developed over the years as more researchers dig deep into linguistics. Also, the thesis statement indicated how the essay studied more on the relationship between human and animal language, similarities, and differences. However, the view is clear and more comprehendible in the multi-source literature review than the four-source essay. In the latter, the thesis statement was unidentifiable such that the reader could not contemplate what the paper was discussing. The writer introduced the piece well, with some definitions but poorly put up the thesis statement.
The six-resource essay dramatically differs from the previous four-source draft. Much of the current is improved in the final six-source writing. Notably, the draft contained significant errors and omissions, so that it would be hard for any reader to understand what the entire paper was discussing. Among the improvements made in the final essay is the inclusion of a title and subtitles. All along with the article as the writer navigates through the subtopics. The first draft lacked a title before the introduction, neither did it have subtitles. This correction made it easier for readers to understand each point more clearly and easier.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Additionally, the final essay has proved to be more precise, more transparent, and more engaging than the four-source draft. Most sentences in the first draft were wordy and hardly understandable. Points from different subtopics were mixed up so that one paragraph had a mixture of conflicting ideas. Also, in the four-source draft, the paragraphs were long, bringing about dormancy in reading. The writer corrected the entire draft; sentences were short, precise, and information related from one conviction to another, paragraph to the other. Also, the sections were shortened according to the ideas they presented. This improvement has made the essay more engaging and clear for any reader to comprehend.
Human language evolved and developed from the historical apes. Other animals, such as primates, have demonstrated their mental development to comprehend sophisticated ideas and signs (Arbib, 2017). For instance, chimpanzees have shown the ability to play guess games against each other better than humans (Martin et al., 2014). These animals have also proven that their main challenge is the ability to utter words. Otherwise, many animals can understand many languages, especially sign language. In other research, researchers found animals to have skills gained by humans between the ages of 3 and 5 years.
Also, many animals can memorize their habitual behavior and environmental maps. That way, they can move too far and come back to their home with minimal challenges on navigation. Also, other animals like dolphins can comprehend grammatical sentences and respond to communications. Therefore, the evidence noted that animals, like humans, can learn complex signs and ideas (Martin et al., 2014). Also, animals mutually understand their languages and communicate effortlessly. The challenges are the inability to understand and share in the human language.
The significant limit for the draft is that it did not research much on animal language about human beings, as it dwelled on human language. Some key factors that the essay could have studied included the evolution and development of animal language and its relation to human speech. Also, the draft did not focus on the format requirements. The writing comprised mixed fonts, and the writer did not satisfactorily do some in-text citations. I would therefore improve the draft by initiating more research on the development of animal language versus the human language. I would also ensure perfect adherence to the writing format requirements.
References
Arbib, M. A. (2017). Toward the Language-Ready Brain: Biological Evolution and Primate Comparisons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1098-2
Martin, C. F., Bhui, R., Bossaerts, P., Matsuzawa, T., & Camerer C. (2014, June 05). Chimpanzee choice rates in competitive games match equilibrium game theory predictions. Scientific Reports, 4 , 5182. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05182
