It has appeared severally that the American framework of government looks like that of a parliamentary system. This is because of the elements like political parties, which work under sterner ideological discipline that everyone else has embraced. It almost appears that it is a mixture of the two systems of government. The United States evidently is not a pure parliamentary or an absolute democracy. It is a constituent of both two elements; the extent to which individuals regulate the process of law making varies.
Presidential democracy is the original presidential system in the USA but practiced in Africa and parts of Asia. The central elements of presidential democracy entail the separation of power between the executive and legislature. The implication of this is that the legislature and government are not independent, but instead have separate origin and survival. Separate origin means both the legislature and judiciary are elected in various elections. Separate survival implies that these branches are elected for a fixed term and none of them has a right to terminate the other. Ultimately, democracy has given chances for a divided government and the power of the different arms of the government is fragmented.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The parliamentary system has its core element as the bringing together of executive and legislature. The survival and origin of each arm of government are not distinct. One popular election completes the parliament, as the executive (cabinet) is chosen from parliament. The head of the cabinet is the prime minister, who is not directly elected.
Preferably, the United States should stick to being a parliamentary system entirely, which presently is not the case. If the US leans towards the parliamentary, the advantage is that the constitution will allow the government to shield the minority from the majority so that not every person and community is domineered.
