Jacksonville city in North Carolina is prone to natural hazards. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the primary hazards include hurricanes, forest fires, flooding, and tornadoes. The city, therefore, requires a well-laid mitigation plan. Jacksonville has stations that have sophisticated equipment used to accurately predict and report the weather. It also deals with beaver dams to address any issues that may lead to flooding (Islam & Ryan, 2016). There is a debris removal contract to act immediately there are high winds. The city has water reserve areas to be utilized in case of forest fires. These are some of the mitigations plans put into place for immediate action if there is a need to counter a natural disaster. The mitigation programs in Jacksonville city focus on the proper use of land, the quality building of houses, and the commitment of the people and the government to counter any natural disaster.
The North Carolina State greatly contributes to the mitigation plan in Jacksonville as the city utilizes its building codes to install new homes. The state also contributes through funding for the success of the mitigation programs. North Carolina has an achieved success in “A compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation” (Hill et al., 2013). The state and federal agencies in North Carolina form the NC interagency Review team. They have the responsibility to oversee compensatory measures in case of a disaster.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The Mitigation efforts in Jacksonville are effective but there is a need for improvement. The local and federal governments should develop a plan to care for people’s mental health as part of the mitigation plan. It should also educate the people to work as a community to overcome the natural hazards that may occur. The city of Jacksonville should also extend its mitigation efforts by creating a website where people can get updated on the mitigation efforts in place and also get crucial information regarding disasters. This way, people can remain more informed and more prepared.
References
Hill, T., Kulz, E., Munoz, B., & Dorney, J. R. (2013). Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: An evaluation of regulatory success. Environmental Management , 51 (5), 1077-1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0027-7
Islam, T., & Ryan, J. (2016). The role of governments in hazard mitigation. Hazard Mitigation in Emergency Management , 69-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-420134-7.00003-5
