The second amendment to the constitution is considered a controversial issue. According to the Second Amendment, the Americans have been granted the right to keep and bear arms without interference. The controversy seen with the amendment is lack of a clear definition of who should access the arms. The ambiguity has resulted in a gap, allowing the courts and legislative bodies to make laws concerning the guns and making interpretations on the way the Amendment is applied. The Second Amendment hoped to promote the security of the state and ensure that people would protect themselves. The advocates for gun control have however interfered with the right since not all people are allowed to possess guns. There are also the stated requirements that an American should fulfill before they are allowed to purchase and keep a gun. Therefore, the right, despite being constitutional has been limited.
I think that the controversy is over the issue itself not because the constitution is being used in addressing it. The cases of mass murder and suicides from the use of guns have increased over time. The right allowed any person, despite their mental condition or age to buy and keep guns in the name of protection. There have been cases of massive shooting especially in high schools resulting in the death of innocent students, simply because the culprit would access a gun. Cases of people killing themselves after a family argument or killing partners have been witnessed. The guns have also increased the rates of crimes in the United States. The number of individuals accessing guns is high, and they use them for cases such as theft and drugs peddling.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The National Rifle Association advocates for the rights of guns. It means it would oppose the repealing of the Second Amendment since it would mean that the right would be removed and the Americans would no longer be allowed to own guns.
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence would support the repealing of the Second Amendment. The organization hopes to reduce the violence which results from the use of guns. It would be done by controlling the individuals who are allowed to have and keep guns.
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) decision would oppose repealing of the Second Amendment. The landmark decision indicated that the Second Amendment is supported by the Fourteenth Amendment which insists on holding and respecting the rights of Americans. Since possessing and keeping guns is a right, the case supports it.
I support the repealing of the Second Amendment. If the number of guns within the crowd can be controlled, the security levels can be improved. Only the trained individuals will be allowed the guns, and they have to pass the evaluation tests. I concluded that a way of bringing justice to the large numbers of people who have been killed due to gun violence.
Constitutional amendments should deal with social issues such as gun rights and safety, instead of changing the governmental structures alone. It will help remove any ambiguity that exists, which calls for other bodies to advocate for the social issues. The constitution should also be specific with every amendment. When it concerns the gun rights, the particular group who should access and keep guns should be specified. The conditions such people should fulfill must also be included for clarity reasons.
