Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar
He served under two presidents. What is interesting about Cuéllar is that he has made significant contributions to law and political science.
Justice Leondra R. Kruger
The most interesting fact about Justice Kruger is that he has massively contributed to the intellectual platforms in her capacity as the editor in chief of the Yale Law Journal.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Justice Goodwin Liu
Despite being born by Taiwanese parents, Justice Liu has towered the American judicial system.
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
As a judge in a court dedicated to dealing with cases of domestic violence, she demonstrated impeccable proficiency and profound experience in handling her cases.
Justice Ming W. Chin
I am intrigued by Chin’s success in business law, whereby he won a case to the tune of a million dollars as a result of infringement of business ethics and legal provisions.
Justice Carol A. Corrigan
It is interesting that Justice Corrigan has amassed years of experience.
Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar
I perceive Justice Werdegar as the epitome of success because she served in the United States Department of Justice.
Los Angeles County Superior Court
It operates 47 courthouses.
Online Dispute Resolution program ODR
Online dispute resolution programs are rapidly increasing. The success of the program stems from the fact that both arbitrators and mediators are now found online. Caseload managers are tasked with the mandate to perform administrative duties for mediation programs.
Section 2
Contracts are particularly binding and oblige both parties to adhere to certain terms stipulated in the contract. Ideally, breaches of contract are punishable by law as long as the contract is valid and the breach was undertaken on purpose. In the presented case, Cohen is undoubtedly entitled to compensation because it was explicitly stipulated in the contract that the client would pay the agent fee. Notably, the United States Constitution gives people the liberty and the free will to choose a religious affiliation they prefer. The freedom of worship means that an individual is allowed to abide by the rules of his or her church as long as it does not infringe the rights of others. In the context of the case under scrutiny, Cohen was unavailable on weekends because of religious guidelines, which forbid the agents from working on weekends. According to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII of the provisions criminalizes religious discrimination. Therefore, denying the agent compensation on the basis of failing to show up on the weekend is an act of religious discrimination, which is prohibited by the civil rights act.
Every citizen in the United States has the liberty to hold his or her desired religious beliefs. Since Cohen made it clear that working on weekends was impossible for him, the client is obliged to respect his religious beliefs and reschedule the meeting. Ideally, Cohen did not infringe any legal or ethical provisions for choosing not to work on weekends. Notably, both parties in a contract are expected to respect the other individual right to belong to any religious affiliation of their choosing as stipulated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As such, the situation in the case would have been easily avoided if the client, Seinfeld, had decided to visit on weekdays. Cohen was under no obligation to work on weekdays, and therefore, he was justified for failing to show up on the weekend. Ultimately, it is imperative that parties bound in a contract strive to make schedules in a manner that does not inconvenience the other party.
