Memories work based on the level of a person's emotions, especially when put under an intense situation like identifying criminals in police line-ups. On the same note, memories also function based on the level of interference by another person, especially if there exist some instructions and procedures to be followed in the case of identifying convicted prisoners in police line-ups (Price, Harvey, Anderson, Chadwick & Fitzgerald, 2019). For instance, false memory can be formed in situations eyewitnesses have the mandate to follow guidelines provided at the time of identification in police line-ups. Consequently, people with more negative emotions may make accurate identification in an intense situation, unlike people with neutral emotions.
Given the concept of the best practices to reduce the instance of eyewitnesses forming false memory, I think the best practices put in place would reduce false identifications. For example, the newly designed meta-analytic review regarding the comparison between the simultaneous to sequential line-ups, it is imperative to note that sequential police-line ups would put an eyewitness in the right state of mind to make an accurate identification (Sauer, Palmer & Brewer, 2019). Additionally, the consideration of a controlled laboratory testing of the accuracy of the eyewitness would reduce the chances of false identification by a significant margin.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Fundamentally, there exist other suggestions that would reduce the chances of false identification. For instance, increasing the amount of information provided by eyewitnesses through improved interview techniques would ascertain the level of confidence of an eyewitness. In this case, chances of eyewitnesses making false identification would be greatly reduced based on the assessment by experts during an interview process (Price at al., 2019). Another significant suggestion entail improving the criminal justice system through the application of advanced modalities of testing the authenticity of eyewitness evidence. For instance, maintaining contact with the witness provides additional and insightful information that could prove the facts of the case.
References
Price, H. L., Harvey, M. B., Anderson, S. F., Chadwick, L., & Fitzgerald, R. J. (2019). Evidence for the belief in live line-up superiority. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology , 34 (3), 263-269.
Sauer, J. D., Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2019). Eyewitness Identification. Psychological Science and the Law , 208.
