The Contact and prejudice research study by Anukam explores the research methodology and analysis aimed at understanding whether political standings can be used to predict the effects of prejudice. The title of the paper is correspondent to its content and therefore fits appropriately. Citations used to explain the concept of causes of prejudices are reliable and well-articulated in the text. They are also accurate as they are central to the information that the author explains. The paper's originality and topicality are well explored as the author uses both past and present research findings that create coherence in the article's flow. The language used in the study is precise, and the use of clear explanations. At the end of the introduction, the research aims are explicitly explained and match the objective of the research paper.
Methods
The methods used to conduct the study were efficient and robust. The use of questionnaires shows that the method used can be repeated to ensure perfect results. Moreover, I think that the research method of utilizing a large number of students' participants provided sufficient and reliable data. The study also upheld standard guidelines, which, in my opinion, prove its efficiency. The participants were well informed about the research purpose, and they signed a form of consent to prove participation approval. At the end of the study, a debriefing was also done on the participants. I think that the use of the Quartic Online System to distribute the questionnaire was efficient, although the differing numeric items offered on the rating skills ought to have been uniform among all the contact measures explained. It means that all the items used should have been fourteen or any other uniform number in the positive contact measure, negative contact measure, and positive and negative feelings measures. However, the scales used to measure the items were efficient since there is proof from reliable sources utilized in the past. The use of numerical data and ratios proves the accuracy of the research methodology.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I think that the strategy used in the procedure of the study is systematic and well planned. I think that the requirements for the study are appropriately utilized as the students can in the necessary information of their age, gender, and ethnicity, which is vital to the aim of the study. In My opinion, the use of fill in thermometer that helped identify students' political inclination was an efficient tool whose results are reliable and unbiased. The methodology that enables a researcher to assign questions randomly is efficient also s it helps give each individual a chance to answer the questions. However, it could lead to unreliable information if the researcher chose to focus on a particular group of students. However, the study utilizes the best ways to understand how different students perceive their colleagues from different political beliefs. The study served its primary purpose since it has maintained the same goal by utilizing particular methodologies, research, and activities that match the research aim.
Analysis
The study provides an excellent basis for more research on the software and its methods to conduct the research. However, the analysis explained in the study is direct to the point, although a detailed analysis of the methods used could give a reader a better grasp of understanding the methods and software used in the study. The paper is well-referenced, and all the citations are appropriately utilized inside the text. The overall structure of the research study is accurate and well formulated. I think the study's findings will be reliable since the research conducted utilize ethical and accurate methods that are essential to successful goal-oriented research.
References
Aberson, C. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 18 (6), 743-760.
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 23 (1), 27-34. https://doi.org /10.1177/096372141351093
Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of intercultural relations , 31 (4), 411-425.