In an intentional tort, the plaintiff must prove the defendant had the intent of causes the harm knowingly (Pollard, 2020). In Castle and Cook case, the two are aware that bribery is a crime and intentional tort. However, they proceed and employ a public official in another country upon receiving bribery. In this case, a litigant may claim that there was tortious interference with hiring an employee because Castle and Cook used unfair intention to award the employment contract. The litigator can ascertain that an employment contract exists, the defendant (Castle and Cook) knew about the contract and legal procedures that must be followed to award the contract: however, the defendant interfered with the hiring process resulting from breaching of the contract (Pollard, 2020). Additionally, the litigator must approve the defendant used improper methods to employ a public official in another country. The litigator must prove that bribe was offered to Castle and Cook, which commit an intentional tort.
Damages available in this case is the loss of employment opportunity by more qualified applicants. Castle and Cook's unfair decision of employing a public official in another country who might be unqualified for the position can deny other qualified and competent applicants the opportunity (Lumen, 2020). Loss of reputation is another damage available in this case. Other employers may consider the plaintiff incompetent and unqualified for a similar job position. Therefore, the defendant should pay for all the damages caused to the plaintiff.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Lumen. (2020). Examples of intentional torts in business | Work within the law . Lumen Learning – Simple Book Production. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/workwithinthelaw/chapter/intentional-torts/
Pollard, C. R. (2020, October 8). Intentional torts . Corey Pollard Law. https://cpollardlaw.com/personal-injury-attorney-virginia/intentional-torts/
