The ABA principles give a systematic approach to the analysis of behavioral attributes of different populations. The principles can be evident from the strategies a study employs in uncovering behavioral traits and the nature of research partaken. The two articles give a behavioral analysis approach to revealing the source and effects of certain behaviors among vulnerable populations. However, in adherence to ABA principles, the article that qualifies for analytic behavioral analysis is “using token reinforcement to increase walking for adults with intellectual disabilities.” First, the methodology used by the study is effective in analyzing behavior with a suitable technological approach that is also feasible. The reverse ABAB procedures are stipulated in the study to give technological competence to other behavioral analytics. It is therefore easy to follow up the procedures used in the article. Besides, the reverse ABAB method used in the study is analytical, hence satisfying a significant number of principles that aid in the analysis of behavior (Krentz et al., 2016). Additionally, the reverse ABAB method is conceptually systematic. In essence, the article uses all ABA principles in attaining plausible results for the study.
The effectiveness of behavioral intervention is essential for the study. The article gives token interventions to the targeted population made up of five individuals (Krentz et al., 2016). Consequently, the study measures the effectiveness of that intervention on the population making it coherent to the ABA principle of effectiveness. In the second article, interventions on the suicidal or injurious behavior of the studied population are not explained. In this regard, the article that does not qualify to be a behavioral analysis study is “The Relationship Between Intentional Self-Injurious Behavior and the Loudness Dependence of Auditory Evoked Potential in Research Volunteers.”
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Moreover, the article employs readily recognizable sociological traits in explaining the effects of token reinforcement. It is essential for behavioral analysts to apply socially identifiable or significant behavioral attributes in the study. To this end, the article satisfies the principle of applicability by using people with intellectual disabilities. Generalization is evident in the population that is studied in the article. According to the ABA principle, behavior is often effective outside the environment under which it is formed. People with intellectual disabilities detest most physical activity like walking. However, in the presence of a reward system, their behavior is significantly changed (Krentzs et al., 2016). The article results show that four members of the studied population changed their behavior due to the presence of tokens and only one member did not adhere to the reward system in adding to the distance walked. Lastly, the decisions or results that are obtained in the study are a result of descriptive statistics. The statistics used to settle for the study results show that the study was analytical and based on the ABA principles.
Ideally, the second article does not employ the full span of the ABA principles making it unsuitable for explaining the relationship between various phenomena in the study. Moreover, the article does not use a conceptually systematic framework in the investigation thus rendering the analysis of behavioral traits on a psychological basis. Also, the article lacks an accurate generalization of the behaviors being measured in the study as specific populations with suicidal tendencies are used (Marsic et al., 2015). For example, it is prudent to note that suicidal behaviors are continuous and do not change with environmental factors. Despite the development of triggers of the suicidal behavior in men, the study does not show the effects of the same triggers on women (Marsic et al., 2015). Therefore, the behavioral analysis results are not plausible. In a nutshell, the second article lacks a behavioral approach to the studied population as most of the aspects studied in the article are psychological with little concern for behavioral intervention
References
Krentz, H., Miltenberger, R., & Valbuena, D. (2016). Using token reinforcement to increase
walking for adults with intellectual disabilities . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 49(4), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.326
Marsic, A., Berman, M. E., Barry, T. D., & McCloskey, M. S. (March 01, 2015). The
relationship between intentional self-injurious behavior and the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential in research volunteers. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 71, 3, 250-257.
