Integrative approaches are valid in the clinical treatments given the amount of theoretical differences and similarities that they bring forth ( Jones-Smith, 2012). Integrative approaches combine concepts and counseling from more than one theoretical approach. This integration involves the combination of frameworks for developing the integration theories that are most likely to help a client. Most clinicians use integrative approaches in their practice. The main reason of integrative approaches is to look for common elements in the theories that might help in the clinical treatments. Most research shows that there is little difference between many theories, and thus using them together will just be as effective in the treatment. Different theories can be used individually to achieve wellness. Not all these mechanisms involve looking at the little differences between the theories. However, it is crucial to understand the similarities and differences of the theories before incorporating them in the clinical treatment. Clinicians also do trial and errors to establish the theory that works best in different scenarios. The integration of the theories can be used by looking at the significant features that work best for various clients. The clinicians often consider the accomplishment versus understanding, mental versus emotional, present versus the part and the firm versus the flexible features in the theory ( Jones-Smith, 2012) .
Integrating theories has various advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of integrating theories include the development of a more workable framework for the patient, as not all theories fit all people or scenarios ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . Additionally, integrating theories allows the counselor to consider that each client is unique, and thus apply theories that can only fit that client’s situation regarding culture, diversity or the issue at hand. Integrative therapy also helps the client to know what they want and thus, the counselor is able to help his or her client achieve their desires. Moreover, theoretical integration offers a new perspective at various levels of different theories due to the synthesis of different models of functions such as personality, psychological and psychopathology ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . Using the integrated approach rarely has disadvantages as the counselor has a wide array of features from various theories to balance while making a decision on which to use on the client. However, some therapist often sees some difficulties such as incommensurability and in eclecticism.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Nevertheless, research shows that rarely does a theory yield more positive outcomes than another does. Different clients often require different treatments depending on their problems. Each client comes in with a different view of cultures, coping style, religion, beliefs and thus the counselor needs to consider all these aspects before getting into therapy ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . Therefore, using various theories through aspects such as assimilation increases the use of practices and views from other systems. The assimilative approach borrows from a broad range of technical interventions from various systems ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . Therefore, by using various theories, the therapists come up with a better approach to a problem per client. Using a single theory may not provide all the features that can help a client in a certain situation.
In the field of psychotherapy, many therapists tend to use special approaches like behavior therapy, cognitive behavior therapy, psychotherapy, and psychoanalysis to reach to the client ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . A combination of these elements is often considered in helping a patient get to know their wants, and in such help, the counselor helps them. For instance, an adult client is experiencing difficulty coping with an unhappy childhood would be best-helped using psychoanalysis, however, a counselor may use cognitive behavior orientation is the best approach to the giving the client help ( Jones-Smith, 2012) . The counselor may also consider a holistic approach whereby he or she integrates the mind emotions and spirits aspects of the client’s problem.
Reference
Jones-Smith, E. (2012). Integrative psychotherapy: Constructing your own integrative approach to therapy. Counselling and psychotherapy: An integrative approach , 585-611.
