National interest can be defined as the interest of the whole population in a country or a state to be independent regardless of other nations or groups. These are policies put in place by the government to enable them to steer towards development putting into consideration the interest of every citizen ( Eising et al.,2017) . Globalization is the integration of states or even continents. It influences cultural, social and economic aspects. It tends to defy the physical geographical distances and borders allowing for transactions across the borders. Although, globalisation is seen to strengthen other countries it also aggravates others. Globalization has had many advantages including, economic blocks, liberation movements, cultural interchange and many others. However, in our case, we shall study the United States which is seen to be disadvantaged by the globalization. Rampant migration into the united states, being a superpower nation it attracts a lot of people in search for greener pastures. This new population is too high that it creates social and economic tension between the immigrants and the locals, this is due to the competition of job opportunities, the local’s democracy is invaded since the new group might have a majority vote in the election. The tension is a problem that can be eliminated by one, giving the locals a higher advantage in job opportunities than the incoming migrants.
There is stratus disruption of the working community. When factories are relocated away from their settlements the labour force is replaced by the new immigrants who are willing to take less pay. this creates social dislocation which is, in turn, vented out politically where the citizens may vote for unqualified personnel who will try to make policies that favour them. In solution, the united states can create job tenure policies where the locals are not worried about losing their jobs to the immigrants. The USA can also create more job opportunities to help them curb future competition.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
There is a lot of dependence the united states have a lot of countries depending on them for aids either technical support or financial support. This denies them the ability to attain their actualization level as a state since a lot of resources are used to help the needy countries to alleviate poverty other than developing the nations (Summers, 2014). This set back could be minimized or eliminated by putting in place policies to help the needy countries alleviate poverty. This could be done using global charters of the united nations or any other global organization.
The global organizational setbacks. The united country has rules and regulations that no one had to deter scientific achievements in the united states since they term them as illegal. The united states have a lot of scientific potentials that has been hindered since they want to abide by the charters shortly it will be better for the united nations to withdraw from the global organizations to achieve their scientific goals.
Terrorist, globalization has made it easier for terror groups to manifest in the whole world. Most eastern and middle east countries are seen as the primary cause of the terror attacks. These terror attacks endanger the investments in the united states. To prevent any financial crisis in the states, the legislative body should put legal rules and policies to stop mass immigration of the east people. Resource distribution is strained. The resources of the countries may not be able to cater for all of the citizens and immigrant’s natural resources like water will become scarce and very expensive. The social imbalance may lead to social and political havoc. To prevent this shortly. The government must invest highly genetically modified foods to avoid a food crisis.
References
Eising, R., Rasch, D., & Rozbicka, P. (2017). National interest organisations in EU policy-making. West European Politics , 40 (5), 939-956.
Summers, L. H. (2014). US economic prospects: Secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound. Business Economics , 49 (2), 65-73.
