For years, the argument over whether or not student-athletes must be compensated has raged throughout the country, with famous athletes such as LeBron James showing support for enabling campus students to work while still in school. University administrators and even politicians have objected to the concept of compensating them. This project has the backing of a large proportion of students around the country. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded in 1905 to assist safeguard student-athletes from professional and commercial mistreatment by exposing them to collegiate athletics as amateurs (Edelman, 2017). This essay starts by emphasizing the need to compensate these student-athletes. Following that, it delves into the arguments why it should be done.
According to statistics, college athletics produce a lot of money, yet the players are never rewarded or recognized for their efforts. According to surveys, college athletics bring in a lot of money. Football and basketball, for example, are multibillion-dollar businesses. These events attract businesses that use these athletes to promote their products. On September 30, 2019, Governor Newsom signed the renowned Fair Pay to Play Act, proposed to the California legislature by Senator Nancy Skinner and Steven Bradford. Starting in 2023, it is expected to take effect. Athletes would profit from their likeness being exploited in the media under the new rule (Edelman, 2017). The proposal would also allow them to retain their sports eligibility while hiring attorneys to represent them in business transactions. The majority of the large sums of money generated by this burgeoning industry go to corporations and institutions, leaving players out. With such Acts being implemented, the initiative to pay these athletes would push students to be more effective, boosting income.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Intercollegiate athletics contribute to a college's overall prestige. The teams' accomplishments contribute to their universities' renown and prominence. As a result, registrations, contributions, and scholarships to these institutions grow. Notwithstanding their hard effort, athletes have financial concerns since they must sometimes cover their expenditures, even though most of them come from low-income families. The majority of this money is distributed in significant wages to the executives and trainers (Zema, 2019). It is critical to recognize that all of the profits are generated by the goods on the field, which is the athletes.
According to the results of a study, 71.13 per cent of participants agreed that athletes should be paid, while 28.87 per cent disagreed. They objected since these athletes receive full scholarships and do not require payment because they cover their expenses. They also claimed that other students who took part in the extracurricular activities that provide money and national prominence to these colleges are not compensated and that all students should be treated equally (Zema, 2019). Occasionally research may be sold for a profit, which benefits the institution. The actual students who participated, on the other hand, are neither acknowledged nor rewarded, so athletes should not be any different. They also said that if the team's leading player were paid more than the other teammate, they would become enraged.
The controversy over whether or not student-athletes must be compensated is still raging, and it's fascinating to hear all sides of the argument. Nonetheless, the benefits of being compensated outweigh the negatives. In the past, public opinion in the United States has been hostile to providing further remuneration to these athletes beyond school tuition. According to various studies, most of the population currently supports the notion (Zema, 2019). The bottom line is that, despite numerous objections that they get total funding that does not include game expenditures or that establishing compensation might be difficult, these student athletes' input should be respected. Although knowledge is a great asset, it cannot meet the growing demands of these students; hence, earning money is essential.
References
Edelman, M. (2017). From Student-Athletes to Employee-Athletes: Why a Pay for Play Model of College Sports Would Not Necessarily Make Educational Scholarships Taxable. BCL Rev. , 58 , 1137. http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3597&context=bclr
Zima, P. (2019). Should Student-Athletes be Paid. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy , 13 (2), 198-212. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17511321.2018.1465112
