The US has been at the forefront when it comes to finding solutions to end the consistent conflicts in the Middle East. In essence, the US has been a part of the efforts to stop extremism ideas propagated by political interests (Rugh, 2017). As it is, the US has used various means to try to bring to an end to decades of civil wars in conflicts in this part of the world. The principal means that the US has adopted include diplomacy and militaristic force, which have been advanced by different US presidents (Jeffrey, Eisenstadt and Rose, 2016). For example, George W. Bush employed aggressive military action while Barack Obama made use of diplomacy to improve on the foreign policies (Hamid, 2016). Interestingly, the results remained the same as these civil wars continued to claim civilian lives in their thousands making militaristic intervention the main solution to the conflicts.
The US has invested heavily in its militaristic capabilities, which then make it the best nation to intervene in the Middle East conflict. As noted, diplomacy as a means to end the crisis has not worked since the political bigwigs in this region are not interested in dialogues and diplomatic relations (Dunne, 2017). Instead, these political bigwigs are individuals who are keen on consolidating their authority even if it means taking the lives of innocent civilians (Dunlap, 2016). In this case, the only solution to end this conflict is through the use of military force. In using military force, the US is likely to succeed in ending the extremism ideas, which has plagued these nations (Serwer, 2016). Moreover, according to Pettinger (2015), the use of military force is considered the best option as it protects other nations from the selfish interests of other nations. For example, Iran has continually threatened to break out of a nuclear deal but it would not as it fears the US militaristic action. This kind of fear assures the rest of the Middle East that their region will be peaceful and free of conflicts.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Dunlap, C. J. (2016). Is the U.S. military strategy doing more harm or good in the Middle East? The Conversation. Retrieved on28 July 2018, from http://theconversation.com/is-the-u-s-military-strategy-doing-more-harm-or-good-in-the-middle-east-59151.
Dunne, C. W. (2017). US military planning in the Middle East: Increasing challenges, vague strategies. Arab Centre. Retrieved on28 July 2018, from http://arabcenterdc.org/policy_analyses/us-military-planning-in-the-middle-east-increasing-challenges-vague-strategies/
Hamid, S. (2016). Is a better world possible without u.s. military force? T he Brookings Institution. Retrieved on28 July 2018, from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2016/10/19/is-a-better-world-possible-without-u-s-military-force/
Jeffrey, J. F., Eisenstadt, M. & Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the U.S. Military role in the Middle East. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved on28 July 2018, from https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/rethinking-the-u.s.-military-role-in-the-middle-east
Pettinger, T. (2015). What is the impact of foreign military intervention on radicalization? Journal of Deradicalization, 5 (2015).
Rugh, W. (2017). American soft power and public diplomacy in the Arab world. Palgrave Communications, 3 (2017), 16104.
Serwer, D. (2016). Recalculating U.S. Policy in the Middle East: Less Military, More Civilian. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from on 28 July 2018 from http://www.mei.edu/content/recalculating-us-policy-middle-east-less-military-more-civilian
