Introduction
North Atlantic Treaty Organization was established with an objective of assisting all the member countries from risks faced during and after the world war. NATO has undergone revolution in combination with its mission. The organization is recognized as one of the leading contributor for security on the internal stage and comprises of several countries such as Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan among other countries. It operates as a crisis management organization with more than 20,000 personnel from different countries. As a result, NATO forms an intercultural coalition that seeks to increase crisis management and financial support to affected countries. This paper focuses on summarizing communication interaction for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Workplace Communication ensures there is an understanding of each worker in an organization. The process involves transmission of information from an individual or a group to other people or across departments. Several factors such as intercultural communication, cultural structure, culture values influence communication which makes it challenging for an organization to achieve the set objectives in the workplace. Communication needs high collaboration to address the risks facing the business. North Atlantic Treaty Organization presents an example of an organization for analyzing the effects of workplace communication and mechanisms applicable in reducing the adverse effects that may face organizations (Doam et al., 2018). NATO consists of more than 20,000 personnel and its success indicates that interaction process is effective.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization comprises of people from countries such as Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq indicating the need for developing collaboration process. As a result, there is presence of different linguistics that needs standardization. However, collaborative working calls for a need of all member countries to work towards achieving a common goal for risk reduction. According to Tannen, (1995) communication in workplace organization results in the development of a common language where people understand the needs of every individual in the work region. NATO has addressed this challenge by creating an authority committee comprised of members from different nations but capable of using a common language. North Atlantic Treaty Organization applies this strategy in communicating across departments such as quality audits, inspections, and evaluation of the financial usage of the company. The committee uses English as the common language thus increasing an opportunity for the organization to achieve its objectives.
NATO displays Power and control activities through government regulations that guide the organization and achieving strategic objectives. North Atlantic Treaty organization was initially formed by twelve member states from Europe and North America, and the Washington treaty remained the dominant element of the organization. The formation of the organization resulted as a result of a negotiation process between the United States and Europe to fight against the rising soviets in the region. The organization has been experiencing several challenges since its establishment causing changes to address such needs in the organization. Powerful interaction among the member countries for NATO reveals in a situation where a combination of the effort by the member countries prevented each country from experiencing the risks that could result from the Soviet enemies (Doam et al., 2018). They protected and engaged in compensation for the damages and excellent communication resulted in the dissolution of the union collective responsible for causing a threat to NATO. Though each country was given the right to self-defense, the mechanisms used were supposed to be reported to the council and could not affect the authority in any way.
NATO established standard operating work with an objective of increasing viability of information across departments. The communication process that existed among the twenty member states for NATO remained effective because they achieved the set objectives of the organization. For instance, the negotiation process succeeded because it created a mutual understanding among the member states resulting in a shared understanding among the member states thus resulting in the formation of mutual understanding. Each department performs is administrative functions that is required for proper control of quality programs for NATO. North Atlantic Treaty Organization focused on forming an alliance based on mutual understanding (Abbott, 2016). For instance, the member countries agreed that self-defense is considered to be the basic need for each member country and whenever a challenge such as terror attacks occurred, each state devoted its effort towards fighting the enemy. The effectiveness in communication resulted in the increment in member states to twenty-eight and the defeat of the Soviet Union. The winning resulted as a result of increased transparency and commitment to a common goal.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization qualifies to be an intercultural communication because of qualities. Though the organization focused on addressing security problems, they operate by handling different types of risk management. The member countries has a simple approach for ensuring there is compliance with the organization’s goals. For example, NATO established a training mission in Iraq with an objective of improving security in the country (Abbort, 2016). In effect, NATO combined military forces from a different background which created an opportunity for people to understand the differences and develop mutual understanding thus increasing an opportunity for the group to achieve its set objectives (Abbott, 2016).
A relationship is an essential aspect of workplace communication because people get involved in a mutual sharing of ideas thus solving any problem facing the member nations. NATO was formed to solve military problems and any other form of risk that could affect member countries. Given the role of NATO, there is platform for sharing ideas and discussing information related to political and military issues. The partnership is committed to provision of broader international support and long-term financial sustainability. Communication created an opportunity for each member state had an opportunity to consult other members thus creating viable projects (Kott et al., 2018). The audit department is expected to table all the finance expenditure services such total defense expenditure, defense expenditures and GDP growth. Financing and compensating the nations for the risks reduced the opportunities that enemies would have on the target countries. NATO success resulted in the dissolution of the Soviet Union which resulted in the development in the states and reduction of adverse effects that would affect the operation of the company.
Conclusion
North Atlantic Treaty Organization achievement of its goals is attributable to the company’s commitment government regulations and commitment in effective communication. Collaboration and transparency among countries such as Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan has created success among the member countries. The social nature of the organization is an intercultural communication organization because it brought people from different cultural backgrounds and collaborated to ensure effective communication among the members. NATO success is attributable to partnership and authoritative control process capable of addressing and mitigating every management problem that affects member countries.
References
Abbott, K. (2016). Understanding and Countering Hybrid Warfare: Next Steps for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Doarn, C. R., Latifi, R., Poropatich, R. K., Sokolovich, N., Kosiak, D., Hostiuc, F., ...& Arafat, R. (2018). Development and validation of telemedicine for disaster response: the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Multinational System. Telemedicine and e-Health , 24 (9), 657-668.
Kott, A., Blakely, B., Henshel, D., Wehner, G., Rowell, J., Evans, N.,&Krutilla, K. (2018). Approaches to Enhancing Cyber Resilience: Report of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Workshop IST-153. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07651 .
Tannen, D (1995). The power of talk: Who gets heard and why. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/1995/09/the-power-of-talk-who-gets-heard-and-why
