The most important goal in my life is the provision of service and social responsibility. I have the duty and responsibility to do great work for society within my blessings as my primary life goal. I want to put a lot of emphasis and priority on mentoring other people in the community towards great achievements in their lives and realizing their potential in accomplishing tasks. I have the aim of becoming permanently active to the needs of society and incorporate my entire family at one point in life. Charity and communal works to help the needy are of significant interests, and it forms a part of my goal in life.
Poor people in society need help. I feed the kids in the children's home. Therefore, I have done some service and social responsibility work. The argument in the hypothetical syllogism relates to my life goal and has three sections. The first section is the major premise, which is "poor people in the society need help." The second section is the minor premise, which is "I feed the kids in the children's home." The last part of the argument is the conclusion, which is, "therefore, I have done some service and social responsibility work."
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The argument in the syllogism statement is that anything that is of importance to society is social or economic, is considered a service to the society, and a form of social responsibility work. I take part in making contributions towards buying food for the less fortunate in the children's home. That contributes to the well-being of the children and assists with the financial constraints of the children's home management. That leads to the conclusion of the argument, implying that the act of feeding children in the children's home is considered service to the community and social responsibility, which is my life goal.
The hypothetical syllogism is valid as it partakes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be accurate, and the conclusion is neither false. Generally, feeding the less fortunate in society is possible. That concludes to be true that the act is social service and social responsibility. Therefore, since the argument is valid and all the three premises are correct, then the case is considered to be sound. It is impoverished people in society who need help. Also, it is possible to help them through feeding programs. The two premises conclude to be accurate as it is part of the responsibility of other individuals to assist the poor.
There are no missing assumptions and pieces of evidence in the hypothetical syllogism. All the premises are substantial as they connect and lead us to the conclusion. That concludes to follow what the two premises are implying. One of the strengths of the hypothetical syllogism is that it establishes the connection between the first premise and the second premise through drawing a conclusion that flows. The dialectic tries to determine whether feeding the less fortunate in the society is the responsibility of the community and whether it should be considered a service. However, the connection is established with the conclusion that the poor need helps, and if assisted in any way, then that will be regarded as social work. It is within the responsibility of the society. There are no significant weaknesses in the hypothetical syllogism.
