The health professionals apply the knowledge of classifying individuals for the treatment and research. The diagnostic labels for behaviors act as a catalyst for patients to feel stigmatized and stereotyped in many ways. The psychiatric impact of labeling behavior abnormal or abnormal goes in a long way to influence and has implications for the achievement of the quality of treatment ( Nolen-Hoeksema & Rector, 2015) . Labeling individuals as normal or abnormal have profound lying consequences on the individuals through apparent discriminations, stigmatizations, and exclusions by the societies from where they hail.
Mental disorders are hard to be separated from the standard behavior. Some of these psychological issues are conditions attributed to the situations that one has gone through. Such are the implications of the mental problems that they generate emotional and depressions ( Sue, Sue & Sue, 2015) . An example of the psychological disorder is the anxiety for those who are stressed out or depressed. The personality disorder is also a condition that is attributed to a mental disease. However, the general view on these mental disorders can be seen to be continuums which are based on the severity of the symptoms, the length of the signs and how much they affect the functionality in life.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
There have been several changes that characterize the transition from the DSM-IV to DSM-5. Some of these changes areas discussed
Neurodevelopment Disorders
In DSM-IV, the term mental retardation was used. However, in DSM-5, the term intellectual disability is used. The DSM -5 calls for the use of the cognitive capacity, popularly referred to as IQ. The communication disorder is recognized in DSM-5 as language issues, speech and sound disorder ( Edition, 2013) . The change in the DSM-IV which did not understand some of the pervasive developmental disorders that failed to meet the DSM-5 communication disorder.
Schizophrenia Spectrum
Two changes were made in the DSM-IV for schizophrenia. In the DSM-IV, just a single symptom was required to meet schizophrenia first-rank. In DSM-5, however, two criterions were needed to diagnose the schizophrenia disease. In DSM-V, the subtypes for schizophrenia included catatonic, paranoid and residual among others.
Bipolar and Related Disorders
The final changes in the DSM-IV and DSM-5 pertain to the bipolar condition. The DSM-IV diagnosis of the bipolar condition includes the mixed episodes that require patients to meet the entire established criterion for the bipolar state. DSM-5, on the other hand, provides for the particular state for all the other bipolar states. The provision allows for the investigation into the history of the patient with the bipolar disease ( Hulley et al., 2013) .
Clinical interviews are seen as a dialogue between the patient and the psychologist. Some of the questions that are relevant to the timeframe and the specifics of the patient’s conditions ( American Psychiatric Association, 2013) . Some of the essential issues that should be asked include asking them why they have come to see you; this way you give them a chance to explain themselves uninterrupted. It also gives you, the psychologists the time to prepare for the scope of the assistance that you will provide to the patient ( Edition, 2013) . According to American Psychiatric Association (2013), m ental status clinical interviews also require the psychologists to ask such questions about the patients’ general feelings and emotional requirements. Such is the need for the process to be rigorous in such a way that it gives the patient adequate room to express and expose some of the weaknesses that they feel from within.
I would prefer making a diagnosis using the DSM-5. This is because the method is advancement from the DSM-IV strategies in many aspects. For example, the DSM-5 provides a new compassionate approach for the clinician to understand and patients’ condition ( Allen, Byrne, Oddy & Crosby, 2013) . For instance, the DSM-5 approach to the bipolar situation is suited in a way that it limits the biases that existed in the case for DSM-IV.
References
Allen, K. L., Byrne, S. M., Oddy, W. H., & Crosby, R. D. (2013). DSM–IV–TR and DSM-5 eating disorders in adolescents: Prevalence, stability, and psychosocial correlates in a population-based sample of male and female adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 122 (3), 720.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®) . American Psychiatric Pub.
Edition, F. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders . American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA.
Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D. G., & Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing clinical research . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rector, N. A. (2015). Abnormal psychology . Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Sue, D., Sue, D. W., Sue, S., & Sue, D. M. (2015). Understanding abnormal behavior . Cengage Learning.
