The current event that has shocked the whole world is the current of COVID-19. There have been many discussions on whether it is safe for children to return to school in person or not. All these debates depend on whether children are affected or not and if the virus will be transmitted to other learners or not and the entire school. Currently, schools are coping with uncertainties in multiple ways, and the common one is that they have introduced online learning. However, the research has been carried out with each person trying to prove if children are safe or not to return to school in person.
Vermund and Virginia (2020) argue that the majority of COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic and comprise about 15-45%. All other people are in the pre-symptomatic stage, whereby people are infections even before reaching the symptomatic phase. According to the article, this aspect has been an area of concern because the rate of infection is high even if people do not or only develop mild symptoms. Re-opening of schools may seem to be challenging due to the high costs associated with implementing safety guidelines. For instance, there is a need for protective equipment such as face masks. The authors state that the virus is higher that measles and influenza in terms of the rate of infection. If there are other modes of learning, then the schools should adopt because they are the most vulnerable.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Munro and Faust (2020) posit that learners are not COVID-19 super spreaders and should be allowed to go back to school. They argued that since the onset of the virus, it had been proven that it is not a respiratory virus for children, and significant numbers show that most of the children have no or mild symptoms. From these reports, children are not the essential spreader sources of the virus, and they should be initiatives to find policies on when they should re-open schools on the person. The authors urge the government to allow children back to learning institutions on a person despite the comorbidities. The main initiative is the detailed surveillance require to ascertain the safety as well as developing the ineffectiveness of the school closure in the past months.
Both the articles are credible because both the sources and authors` credentials and affiliations are accurate. They have transparently articulated their research, implying that they are not associated with a particular interest group. Both articles are peer review, and they have listed the sources and ensure that each reference is subject to scrutiny. Both the pieces are also valid because reputable publishers checked the facts and information to make it safe before distribution. From the report provided by Munro and Faust (2020), it was published by the Archive of Disease in Childhood. It is a reputable journal that tends to check and verified any article before they post on their website. Clinical Infectious Disease published the article of Vermund and Pitzer (2020). It is also a credible journal that has been verified to post accurate articles with accurate facts and information. both articles are all up to date
In terms of biasness, Munro, and Faust (2020) are biased compared to Vermund and Pitzer (2020). The former did not pay attention to facts or create a logical argument to support their opinion. There was no data collection and only depended on past reports of other diseases to compare it with the current pandemic. For Vermund and Pitzer (2020), the coded data and verify the facts with multiple data sources.
References
Munro, A. P., & Faust, S. N. (2020). Children are not COVID-19 super spreaders: Time to go back to school. Archives of Disease in Childhood , 105 (7), 618-619. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319474
Vermund, S. H., & Pitzer, V. E. (2020). Asymptomatic transmission and the infection fatality risk for COVID-19: Implications for school re-opening. Clinical Infectious Diseases . https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa855
