Scholars for centuries have endeavored to scrutinize the Bible to establish its origin and validity, ethics, the inerrancy of the bible authorship, and the criteria for inclusion of materials to the Biblical Conon. Brad Braxton’s scrutiny is based on the ethnicity aspect of the bible. His approach covers the aspect of ethnicity that was overlooked in most of the biblical accounts.
Braxton’s approach is more exciting since it emphasizes critical and direct investigation of the text. It involves directly criticizing the text to validate the arguments. Also, it allows the reinforcement of specific social issues in the community setting as written. The model adopted by Braxton is fundamental, and supporting reason for the intended modification are conveyed in a manner that is easy to follow and understand.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
This approach is not perfect because it overemphasizes the modifications as the principal stance of his theology. The arguments in the approach are biased because they focus on the importance of the modification and why such alterations should be adopted, rather than presenting a balance between the two standpoints. The thoughts presented by the author are parallel to the message presented in the Bible. Thus, it can postulated that Baxton is ignoring the importance of the preserved excepts. Also, the thought uses minor issues to build too much argument. The approach driven by omission or addition of theological information may result from a lack of or the presence of surplus information. Omission also may result from the brevity of the author and addition may stem from the need for clarification. This approach is crucial in this context because it helps in incisive analysis of the text. The approach is useful in identifying, understanding, and analyzing of the text, through the identification of spots of possible omissions or unnecessary addition.
