Councilors are a significant individual in the community today since they play a major role in bringing back different person in the community to their senses. The role of such persons in the current society which is full of stressors and misbehavior cannot be underestimated. To help the clients who are currently overwhelming, councilors also need to have some cooperation from the customer. This paper majors on some aspect of counseling and how the counselor moves the client from insight to the action. Within the article, the issues of miracle question will be addressed. The effects of resistance and goal setting are some of the matters which the paper will major on.
What is the “Miracle Question” and how might this impact a client’s perspective?
Miracle question is more of goal setting question which is very important and is used when the customer under question doesn't know what the future or the preferred tomorrow would look like. This problem is fundamental when the councilors are handling a couple who does not know what they want for each other or their families. The answer to this question by the client is hold back by the counselor even if it looks invalid; the counselor then asks the client what this issue may help him/her positively. The Miracle question catapults the clients from saturated problems into some form of visionary and reality. This is very important since it makes the therapist realize where the issue is. Alternatively, it helps the therapist know what client wants.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
What are some forms of resistance? Why would a customer resist an action designed for his/her good?
The issue of resistance is defined differently and in various forms by the different therapist in the field of psychology. However, on many occasion, this word has been used to refer to the inability of the client or their unwillingness to fully grow or participate in the therapy process. There are many reasons why an individual may not be willing to participate or grow in the therapy. The factors can be pinned down to the issue s of the social environment, the client attitude, or the mode of interaction between the customer and the counselor. However, in all these circumstances of resistance, there are often forms of resistance which the clients mostly show. The first form is the silence or minimal interaction with the therapist. There is wording or verbosity. Alternatively, other client’s shows a preoccupation with symptoms, while others show irrelevant small talks during the process. Other forms of resistance are not keeping appointments, seductiveness, concern with future issues, and false promises. Dealing with resistance is very important in this process ( Caswell et al., 2013). The following are some of the strategies which can be used to deal with resistance. First, educate the client about the issues of resistance. While questioning customers, use Socratic majors to bring pout client. Alternatively, allow the customer have their choices and many others.
How does goal setting fit into the action phase?
The third face of the counseling process is significant, and it has elements called the goal setting. The goal setting, in this case, is more of the collaborative decision, and it has the three Cs that is the choice, change and the copying. In this case, the clients have to set the goals they want to achieve during the counseling process. The goals have to be put down as a reminder for the limit set by the clients. The goals have to have obstacles which the customer has to records some important steps on how to combat the obstacles. This process is critical in the actions faces where the client needs to set what they want to achieve, deal with barriers and then cop up with the change.
References
Kottler, J. A., & Carlson, J. (2013). Helping beyond the 50-minute hour: Therapists involved in the meaningful social action . Routledge.
Caswell, D., Eskelinen, L., & Olesen, S. P. (2013). Identity work and client resistance underneath the canopy of active employment policy. Qualitative Social Work , 12 (1), 8-23.
