Human rights are at a crossroads since they are continuously changing with time in order to realize its concept and development with respect to law in their universal acceptance. Therefore, there is a need for contesting human rights as it traces the equilibrium between the dynamics of innovation, resistance, and diffusion of rules. Contributors to human rights propose that the creative contest of global governance and emerging new opportunities can aid in reconstructing human rights and reducing its modern challenges ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) . At the same time, contesting makes it an invaluable tool for students and scholars law, politics, and global governance as well as the evolution of human rights.
Contesting for human rights, particularly the rights and regulations required in child-rearing still faces numerous challenges as there is a little agreement to the universal applicability of its standards. Rearing of children across the globe is strongly influenced by ethnic culture a child is born in and it is passed down across generations alongside the norms associated with proper disciplinary practices ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) . These practices vary across cultures and some acts that are considered to be abusive in a given culture may differ. A common example is the case of punishment; where people of the Caribbean and African descent may enforce harsh corporal reprimand on their children. In contrary, Europeans enforce lighter punishments such patting their bottoms or grounding them. More so, diversity is not only across different cultures but within systems as well where various families have different insights and spiritual beliefs ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) . Additionally, social-economic status also may influence child-rearing practices. This is evident when parents from a low social-economic status practice harsher disciplines as opposed to their counterparts. Countries such as Sweden, Finland, and Denmark have abolished this type of punishment, others strongly support it while other nations having neutral opinions.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Given the conflicting ideologies on proper child-rearing, parenting has become a difficult task, as a single breach of children rights may attract legal lawsuits from relevant authorities. Therefore, the best method of raising children would be teaching them self-respect as well as respect for others. Despite having the diverse cultural obligations and practices, everyone should adhere to the rules and regulations of human rights imposed by law ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) . In the broadest sense, contesting rights should be the duty of every person regardless of cultural beliefs. For instance, in the United States, family-centered programs have been developed and adopted by many citizens to focus on child welfare, youth justice, and mental health. Their aim is to rally families to support the care, and protection of children ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) .
Risk-averse practice is another technique that ensures human rights are adhered to as it pushes practitioners to uphold professionalism when doing their work. The primary goal is to investigate and prevent abuse of children’s right before it escalates further. The existence of this technique pushes protection workers in practicing risk management more cautiously with the existing child protection laws. Another way of protecting children rights is by state intervention in family life. Parents have limited parental rights in raising their children according to what they believe to be the right way ( Connolly & Ward, 2008) . The state has the right to interfere with the family only when they have evidence of a risk or actual harm to the child.
Conclusion
All citizens have equal rights, responsibilities, and duties. Therefore, everyone should respect the rights of others by protecting them in order to experience complete freedom. However, respecting the rights of others also means contesting and protecting the dignity of people without any form of discrimination.
Referenes
Connolly, M., & Ward, T. (2008). Morals, rights and practice in the human services: Effective and fair decision-making in health, social care and criminal justice . Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
