Traditionally, education served as a luxury offered to the powerful and the rich, although the concept has changed in the recent years owing to its widespread accessibility. Nonetheless, not all persons are capable of accessing education adequately since a considerable number of individuals experience strains when it comes to paying tuition fees. For instance, it is probable to come across individuals who might develop a cure for cancer or AIDS, although such persons need to rival against en education system that favors individuals with considerable amounts of funds as opposed to those having good grades (Trade-Schools, 2019) . In addition, it is crucial to note that whereas scholarships might assist a number of bright persons, not all people access similar opportunities of applying for them. Furthermore, scholarships might not always address everything related to education. They fail to cover the overall tuition fees whereas others are normally biased. In this case, acquiring adequate education particularly among the disadvantaged members within the society is problematic (Columbia University, 2018) . Thus, the paper argues on the idea that education should be free for everyone.
In 2014, an incidence emerged in Westminster, England of students requiring institution of changes to the education policies. According to the students, all people opportunities for accessing education irrespective of their background. The march by the students advocated for the abolishment of tuition fees, address the education cuts issue, and ensure that education emerged marketable (Columbia University, 2018) . In support of this issue, various persons perceive education as a business, especially when it comes to higher learning while other contradictory ideas are folly (Trade-Schools, 2019) . Students are treated as consumers targeting buying certificates that can serve as proof of their proficiency. Education fetches higher prices that continue increasing annually thereby leading the student community to dissent it (Russell, 2018) . The reason for this is that they believe that the financial benefits that learning institutions relates to desecration.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The National Education Association also supports the need offering education freely. It argues that in the past, pursuing education in high school served as a luxury. Nonetheless, when education emerged a need for establishing careers, it became essential to support it using public funds, while it serves as a right for all country members (Columbia University, 2018) . Presently, education, especially in univ ersity follows a similar trend while it provides individuals with the opportunity of serving as full democracy participants, hence needs availing freely (Lybeck, 2019) . Before arguing that it is not possible to offer free education for all, it is crucial to look at nations, including Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Sweden, Mexico, Finland, and Brazil, which have emerged successful in offering free education to their populations (Columbia University, 2018) . In this case, questions arise as to what challenges prevail when it comes to offering free education in nations, such as the U.S.
Various institutions operate as avenue that part individuals from their money while others target the most vulnerable while promising them jobs. They lead the students to believe that education is an investment that contribute to successes although this does not always serve as the case (Kurfiss, 2018) . Initially, it was unimaginable to offer free education to children since it targeted those from prestigious families. Since persons in the past managed to outdo their bias and prejudice toward the ones in distinct social classes, people today should focus on rising past their blind consumerism and greed while paving way for a promising future (Burnett, 2017) . It is crucial to focus in liberating the learners from student loans while at the same freeing individuals in line with offering them right for studying the things that they wish without considering the issue of affordability (Columbia University, 2018) . With this kind of an approach, it would be possible to welcome additional talents in the learning environment who add to the existing pool of capable individuals in the country (Trade-Schools, 2019) . Doing so would also contribute toward dealing with issues related to crime, homelessness, while offering those with limited prospects, hope.
In the meantime, emphasis on realizing finances for supporting education would be directed elsewhere. Huge companies that anticipate hiring the brightest and best students from an institution might consider financing them and choose the talents they prefer. This kind of an approach would change the students’ landscape, particularly the ones incapable of securing jobs (De Gayardon, 2018) . It would also be crucial to look into the booming tourism business mostly because foreigners have studied America for a long time. Those anticipating realizing benefits from the American educational system and understand its syllabus should consider joining through investment partners, including Keystone Academic and other related institutions, although as paying learners (Columbia University, 2018) . Various other ways prevail of freeing education, although this is dependent on whether the society is prepared to free the education from serving as a business entity.
In case learning institutions fail to catch on because of the fluidity of today’s society, they might start losing with the learners seeking pursuing free online courses as opposed to spending significant amount of funds in brick and mortar learning environments, which are unfeeling and not quite educational during certain instances. Certain reports reveal that higher education is growing increasingly irrelevant today since a large number of individuals are holding degrees as opposed to skills. In this case, it is crucial to look into education and focus on reworking its structure (Columbia University, 2018) . As opposed to focusing on just money, the education system needs to emphasize on the things that really matter, such as ensuring that the next generation acquires the relevant skills to succeed in life.
Additionally, from an ethical viewpoint, is appears unfair that individuals having less finances miss various educational opportunities. Ethically, all persons should have access to educational opportunities. Whereas it is true that opportunity availability should not assure that individuals acquire the openings, ruling out the opportunity would be inappropriate (De Gayardon, 2018) . For instance, it is crucial to ensure that all individuals are qualified for working as air traffic controllers even though blind individuals would not be able to secure those kinds of positions. Here, it would not be essential to rule out the opportunity by default. Free education, particularly when it comes to higher education would offer various opportunities that certain persons might not enjoy. Even with failure to guarantee such kinds of jobs, it is not essential to rule them out by default (Russell, 2018) . This serves as the case for those persons who cannot utilize higher education on matters related to finances.
Certain persons might utilize free education as a means of refraining from work as well as a way avoiding doing anything in their lives. For students in high school during their final year, they are incapable of securing full-time jobs, while they depend on their wages hence the need for ensuring that their education is free (De Gayardon, 2018) . Nonetheless, in the event of those persons who manage to secure full-time jobs and adopt independent lives, they might get out of the working environment by relying on an education system. Even while the qualifications are offered freely as opposed to living expenses, individuals might still manage to claim several advantages and not realize any incentive of ever securing a job for being in the education system for many years (Lybeck, 2019) . On the other hand, if education were offered freely to the learners, it would become easy for individuals to waste their time with an education that does not add meaning to their lives. Some argue that taking the decision for getting into debts in terms of student dollars to secure a career needs to be challenging and agonizing to allow the learners think twice concerning the decision (Kurfiss, 2018) . Offering all education freely would require less thought while the learners might end up wasting their time in the education system studying for courses that they do not want.
In the event that students are searching for higher education in a genuine manner as opposed to searching for a reason for not doing anything through exploiting the tax money of other persons via free education, such kinds persons might enjoy increased educational processes. For instance, a learner taking several law qualifications would require remaining in the education system for between five and seven years, which would be quite costly (Kurfiss, 2018) . By removing the education costs, the persons would manage to pursue certain jobs intermittently, extend the duration of their qualification, and take additional time to attain the needed qualifications comfortably. As opposed to spending many years serving as a low-income student while establishing budget, they should spend increased amounts of time on qualifications and working while learning at the same time (Burnett, 2017) . In this manner, they would be able to witness an amazing educational experience.
Overall, irrespective of the various downsides or upsides attributed to the free education system for all, it would become ineffective since colleges and universities would spoil it. In the present society, it is significantly easy to secure student loans, while this has resulted to universities and colleges raising their prices to unimaginable levels. They have also incorporated courses, which do not add any relevant value to individuals anticipating to access the workforce. In the event that learning institutions received full funding from tax money, they would encourage the learners to join the diverse frivolous and silly courses since education quality would not be applicable any longer. Overall, offering free education would make it possible for the serious individuals to secure learning opportunities, particularly the bright and hardworking ones, allowing them to become productive members of the society.
References
Burnett, K. (2017). We need to talk about free education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/we-need-talk-about-free-education
Columbia University. (2018). Why education should be free. Retrieved from https://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rqh2000/2018/02/14/why-education-should-be-free/
De Gayardon, A. (2018). What free higher education really means (and doesn’t mean). Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/what-free-higher-education-really-means-and-doesnt-mean
Kurfiss, D. (2018). Should college be free? Retrieved from https://www.studentdebtrelief.us/news/should-college-be-free/
Lybeck, E. (2019). University should be free for all students, not just the wealthiest. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/jan/17/university-should-be-free-for-all-students-not-just-the-wealthiest
Russell, C. (2018). Why education should be free. Retrieved from https://www.theodysseyonline.com/education-free
Trade-Schools. (2019). Should college be free? pros, cons, and alternatives. Retrieved from https://www.trade-schools.net/articles/should-college-be-free.asp
