One of the issues that Guinier raises is that the court failed to redress inequalities in resources, power, and educational opportunity. This might be important to the Interest-Divergence Dilemma since it is evident that racism distracts from equal distribution of resources and power. The court, according to Guinier, did not spell out how meaningful integration in public schools would occur (Guiner, 2004, p.107). Geographically segregated public schools did not have adequate resources to fund the integration program. The courts therefore, did not guide on how exactly the integration in the education system would be unbiased.
The understanding of this issue is not different with Rosenberg’s thoughts since the impact of the decision was not as strong as the proponents had hoped. The provision that permitted students’ transfer to schools where their race was minority to schools where it dominated was questionable. According to Rosenberg, this plan intensified racial segregation rather than alleviating it (Rosenberg, 2008, p.47). Little success was realized especially in the poorly-developed and less funded schools. Guinier and Rosenberg therefore present similar thoughts concerning the court’s ruling, which did not anticipate the challenges of the move to integration.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The article about the Cold War and the Brown decision help in the understanding of this case. According to the article’s author Mary Dudziak, the Cold War and the Brown decision are not only related chronologically but are also parts of the same story (Dudziak, 2004, p.32). Brown is a highlight of a continuous and spirited struggle by lawyers and proponents. Being in the context of the Cold War decade, Brown served to save the face of the U.S government in the international realm since cases of segregation were detrimental. This article therefore expounds on the Brown case.
References
Dudziak, M. L. (2004). Brown as a Cold War case. The Journal of American History , 91 (1), 32-42.
Guinier, L. (2004). From racial liberalism to racial literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-divergence dilemma. Journal of American History , 91 (1), 92-118.
Rosenberg, G. N. (2008). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? University of Chicago Press.
