DeGrazia, D. (2014). The case for moderate gun control. Kennedy institute of ethics journal , 24 (1), 1-25.
The article seeks to address the form of suitable firearm policy. It assumes that there exists a moral and legal right to private firearm possession. The study proposes that, in contradiction to the background of moral and legal rights, the most defendable policy tactic in America could feature moderate firearm control. The opening segment sums up the US firearm control current situation and typifies the so-called “moderate firearm control.” The subsequent segment lists and refutes six primary claims against this universal method to firearm policy. The third segment presents a positive argument for moderate firearm control, which underscores safety inside the homes and societies in addition to rights whose implementation involves certain qualifications or limits on the right to possess guns. The article also demonstrates how the suggested firearm restrictions address genuine purposes, instead of enforcing arbitrary regulations on firearm rights, and provides ultimate reflections.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
LaFollette, H. (2018). In Defense of Gun Control . Oxford University Press. Retrieved on June 11 11, 2020, from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/in-defense-of-gun-contro/
The current article is a review of LaFollette’s (2018) In Defense of Gun Control . According to the article, LaFollette has provided an enlightening, convincing and decipherable influence on the philosophical works on the United States’ gun discussion, which is still comparatively small. LaFollette provides a summary of 3 key categories of arguments against and for gun control, i.e., empirical arguments, rights-based arguments, as well as armchair arguments. LaFollette assesses each in sequence, and in the end, highlights where and how the gun rights stand is inadequate, and why the argument supporting gun control is stronger. LaFollette concludes by particularizing some recommendations for gun control, counting certain distinguished (and much-discussed) rules, such as gun registering and background inspections on firearm acquisitions, and a notion that is quite new and slightly debated, compulsory liability insurance for firearm possessors.
Rock, M. G. (2020). The Effects of Gun-Free Zones and Mass Shootings. Walden University Press.
This qualitative analysis investigated the knowledge and experiences of staff and teachers concerning the usefulness of the Gun-Free School Zone Act (GFSZA). The study applied a social construction framework to guide the thesis. The study addressed the research question concerning the viewpoints of secondary school faculty and staff in the southeastern area of the US about the kind of the association between the social concept of social populaces associated with the GFSZA and the strategy’s effectiveness in stopping mass fatality cases in the campus. The study also spoke to safety precautions that must be taken to prevent school firings. Data gathered from twenty-five unidentified online studies were analyzed and coded to ascertain the themes. In general, the study result confirmed that, for GFSZA to be more efficient in safeguarding staff and students from mass killers, changes to the policy were necessary. The article is important since it could have a major influence on constructive social change by enabling better insight into school firings and informing the establishment of procedures and policies that could be successful in stopping these offenses from happening.
Santaella-Tenorio, J., Cerdá, M., Villaveces, A., & Galea, S. (2016). What do we know about the association between firearm legislation and firearm-related injuries?. Epidemiologic reviews , 38 (1), 140-157.
The article is a systematic review of studies that explore the relationships between gun-associated acts and gun killings, suicides, and accidental deaths/injuries. The authors limited their search to surveys published between 1950 and 2014. Data from a hundred and thirty studies in ten nations infers that in some countries, the concurrent application of laws that target various gun restrictions is connected to decreases in gun deaths. Acts controlling the acquisition of and access to guns are also connected to reduced numbers of intimate partner killings and accidental gun deaths in youngsters, correspondingly. The studies’ limitations included challenges related to ecological design, their implementation, and the deficiency in the heftiness of results to model stipulations. The article is relevant since it contains information the is vital for advancing this field and for developing successful policies that might offset the threat that gun injuries pose on people.
Swanson, J. W., McGinty, E. E., Fazel, S., & Mays, V. M. (2015). Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy. Annals of epidemiology , 25 (5), 366-376.
The current paper aims to describe epidemiologic data about danger of firearm violence and suicide associated with psychiatric illnesses, in contradiction of media-driven public views of the hazardousness of mentally sick persons and assesses the efficiency of laws and policies intended to inhibit gun death and injury linked to serious mental disorders as well as substance use illnesses. The authors reviewed the study about public perceptions toward individuals suffering from a mental disorder and juxtaposed it with data from standard epidemiologic and clinical surveys of mental illness and violence and the correctness of therapists’ risk appraisals. Study results show that media versions of mass firings by distressed persons spur public attention and support the widespread belief that mental sickness leads to violence. The authors conclude that policy-making at the edge of firearm violence deterrence and mental disorder must be grounded in epidemiologic information about risk to boost the feasibility, effectiveness, and impartiality of policy programs.
The Wall Street Journal. (2015). Gun-control backers turn to focus on domestic violence. Fox News. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/us/gun-control-backers-turn-focus-to-domestic-violence
This article explains that the suggested Arizona bill bars individuals charged with domestic violence or homicide from possessing a firearm, whereas on bail. The ban on domestic violence culprits from owning guns help in stopping gun deaths and violence in America. Nevertheless, the domestic violence gun proposals aid to prevent homicide occurrences, the National Rifle Association (NRA) asserts that the firearm prohibition defiles the public’s rights to hold a gun. According to the author, owning guns permits people to exercise their constitutional rights as established in the Second Amendment. Moreover, firearm possession boosts the self-defense of people against lawbreakers and enhance the safety of people in a nation. The article is relevant since it provides an insight into how the firearm prohibition improves the safety of the US citizens.
Wolf, R. (2014). Supreme Court upholds gun ban for domestic violence. USA Today . Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/26/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence/6918457/
This article shows the effort of the government to avert domestic violence by barring firearm possession amongst murderers in the nation. While the Supreme Court announcement banned the murderer from holding arms, the gun rights association censured the ruling maintaining that the federal law hinders the public’s right to firearm possession. According to the author, numerous states in America do not differentiate between activities resulting in injuries and real violence. Thus, the federal law which encourages justice is dependent on state rules to distinguish between actions causing and actual violence. Verification of domestic violence cases leads to outlawing gun possession amongst the criminals. The article is relevant since is shows how forbidding possession of gun amongst committers of murders help in minimalizing non-deadly firearm injuries and illegal deaths in the nation.
References
DeGrazia, D. (2014). The case for moderate gun control. Kennedy institute of ethics journal , 24 (1), 1-25.
LaFollette, H. (2018). In Defense of Gun Control . Oxford University Press. Retrieved on June 11 11, 2020, from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/in-defense-of-gun-contro/
Rock, M. G. (2020). The Effects of Gun-Free Zones and Mass Shootings. Walden University Press.
Santaella-Tenorio, J., Cerdá, M., Villaveces, A., & Galea, S. (2016). What do we know about the association between firearm legislation and firearm-related injuries?. Epidemiologic reviews , 38 (1), 140-157.
Swanson, J. W., McGinty, E. E., Fazel, S., & Mays, V. M. (2015). Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy. Annals of epidemiology , 25 (5), 366-376.
The Wall Street Journal. (2015). Gun-control backers turn to focus on domestic violence. Fox News. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/us/gun-control-backers-turn-focus-to-domestic-violence
Wolf, R. (2014). Supreme Court upholds gun ban for domestic violence. USA Today . Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/26/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence/6918457/
