Approximately 600,000 people are released from prisons every year with the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimating that more than three-quarters of the people are rearrested within a period of less than five years (Morenoff & Harding, 2014). In this study, Morenoff & Harding (2014) engage readers in trying to understand whether and how mass incarceration has had any impact on the social and economic position of the United States, as well as, reflecting on how residential neighborhoods are reeling with the high levels of reentry. The study builds on the understanding that the occurrence of mass incarceration, specifically targeting the minority communities, has had serious implications on their abilities to get employment after they have been released. Consequently, this highlights its value in highlighting how the prisons today are engaging prisons as a way of ensuring that they are well prepared for employment.
The main issue to note is the United States gives employers the authority to undertake a background check for job applicants to determine whether they have been convicted of any crimes in the past. That serves as a clear indication of the fact that a majority of the prisoners released into the community face a wide array of challenges that impact on their ability to get employment. The topic on preparation of inmates for employment is essential in trying to understand the steps that the government has taken towards ensuring that prisons are well prepared for the job market. In addition, this will also play a critical role in justifying the value of preparing inmates for employment as part of the rehabilitation process as a way of reducing the risk of reoffending to help reduce the number of inmates that are rearrested.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The topic on Preparing Inmates for Employment once Released from Prison seeks to establish how criminal convictions are affecting the ability for former prisoners to get viable employment opportunities. A criminal conviction limits one’s ability to get employment considering that this is reflected in one’s background; thus, meaning that a majority of employers may not be willing to hire such individuals (Sexton, 2016). Sexton (2016) seeks to examine the issue of incarceration as it relates to the individual as a unit of analysis with the focus being towards examining how the family would be of value towards preventing recidivism and incarceration with the specific focus being on employment. The study highlights the fact that the policies adopted in the United States have failed in their bid towards creating a conducive environment that would allow for reabsorption of prisoners back into the society.
The main question that the research will seek to answer is how the criminal justice system is preparing the inmates not only for employment but also for self-sufficiency. In this case, the only way that the prisoners would be considered as being self-sufficient is by determining whether they have been able to get employment opportunities that would sustain their livelihoods. That would mean having to try and understand the role that the prison system may have played in the preparation of the prisoners for the world of employment in a bid to improving on their overall capacities to remain self-sufficient. A survey will be conducted focusing on individuals that have been released from the criminal justice system with the intention being towards understanding the nature of challenges that they are experiencing in trying to get employment. The study will build on the data collected to help prevent a valid position on how the government ought to handle the issue of employment after release from the criminal justice system as one of the key approaches to enhancing self-sufficiency.
References
Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2014). Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annual review of sociology , 40 , 411-429. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145511
Sexton, T. L. (2016). Incarceration as a family affair: Thinking beyond the individual. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice , 5 (2), 61-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000062
