I selected number 6. The authors are Lipovsky, Tidwell, Crisp, Kilpatrick, Saunders, and Dawson. The article was published in 1992.
The study was used to establish the use of minors as potential witnesses in criminal cases. The features of cases where young ones are used as a source of evidence are included (Lipovsky & Tidwell, 1992).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The dependent variable is the number of cases where children are used as witnesses, and it is measured by whether the cases are prosecuted at lower rates in comparison to cases with adult witnesses. The independent variable is witness children, and it is measured by the number of children involved in cases as witnesses.
A survey of case files in Alabama, Florida, and South Carolina is the research design used in the study. Data collection was done using an instrument developed where data was gathered from the case files.
Mean, mode and standard deviation were the statistical approaches used in the study. The number of children who participated in the study as indicated in table 1 was 311, and the mean age was determined to be 10.81 with a standard deviation of 3.86.
The research question in the study is: what are the attributes of the court cases where the minor are used as witnesses with the adjudications through a guilty plea, trial acquittal or trial conviction?
To find an answer to the research study, 316 criminal court cases were studies using the previously documented case files. The results of the study indicated that there were about 16.8 % settled offense cases which were determined using a trial proceeding. The judgment of the cases was variant in the states as well as due to the case disposition (Lipovsky & Tidwell, 1992). The research question opened a chance for future studies, which will be meant to determine if cases, where the witnesses are children, are prosecuted at lower rates in comparison to cases by adults.
Reference
Lipovsky, J. A., & Tidwell, R. (1992). Child Witnesses in Criminal Court. Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 16, 635-650. doi:0147-7307/92/1200-0635506.50/0
