Child behavior requires that the particular parties involved in the process of altering any patterns to adopt such procedural practices that reflect an accurate diagnosis of the problem exhibited by the learners. In the “Crying and Marching “case study, the case of Zack presents various issues that require a careful analysis of the perceptual analysis, diagnosis and intervention approaches that the institution proposes as effective interventions to address the problem. According to the BACB’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts professional child handlers require to apply scientific based principles in each of the three aforementioned phases of dealing with an behavioral issues exhibited by the children. However, after a careful analysis, it is evident that the case of Zack does apply this procedural framework in each of the three stages resulting to multiple ethical issues as the subsequent section will show.
The first ethical concern identified for this case study is the principal’s actions;Ms. Debalivirie, to deal with the problem of Zack through the use of punishment in her office every time the child has an outburst even before understanding the underlying problem. Zach Will’s crying outburst is a symptom of an underlying issue that triggers these outbursts and thus it is important for the institution to first assess and diagnose the problem. From this point of view, accurate behavioral analysis, if ignored may complicate the paradigm of finding accurate solutions to the problem. Contrary to Section 1, subsection (1) of the BACB’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts that instructs the use of scientific knowledge to not only diagnose a problem but also find solution. The principal errs in the way that she approaches the issue.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
To address this ethical concern, the Proposed Course of Action is to conduct a Behavioral Assessment of Zack to determine the underlying issues that trigger the outbursts. Second is to assess the rights of the client and determine whether the actions of the principal are in line with the Code of Ethics for Behavior Analysts (BACB).
The second ethical concern identified in this case is the imposition of the behavioral change approach on the teachers of Zack by the principal, Ms. Ms. Debalivirie to deal with Zack outburst despite her not spending time with the child. Behavioral Change approaches should be created through the input of the teachers and care givers who spend time with the child. It is evident the rules of dealing with Zack’s that she imposes on the teachers including Mr. Craig contradict scientifically proven approaches that have been shown to be effective such as using kindness to calm Zack down. It is wrong for supervisors of teachers to impose authority over the care givers and teachers without consultation because authority as stipulated in the BACB’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts section 4, clause (2) that require a consultative approach in the behavioral change programs.
The solution for this ethical concern is the approval of the Behavior Change program for Zack after the analysis of the Behavioral Assessment Report is presented as outlined in the Section 4 of sub section 4, that stipulates intervention approved after the input by all parties involved in the life of the child. The approval process requires that the input of the report and information gathered on the life of the child. Also, the school should identify the environment conditions that interfere with the successful implementation of the program and therein suggest ways of eliminating those conditions. The elimination of these conditions is important because it allows the child to recover with any such factors that may slow down their recovery process
