A leader is an individual who performs functions like directing, motivating, coordinating, selecting, and settling conflicts. There is much contention over who makes a better leader between women and men. However, many men and women have turned out to be effective leaders through their perceptions and leadership styles. According to a research conducted by Appelbaum, Audet & Miller (2013), there are tons of contrasts in the styles that women and men utilize in their leadership. Further, the research indicates that there are similarities in their leadership styles.
Both men and women have turned out to be effective leaders. A few people think that men are superior to women on the grounds that men have more leadership qualities than women. Some of the qualities like undertaking tasks and self-assuredness are normally seen to be part of an effective leader which is highly connected to men. They are additionally accepted to be unrivaled in light of their initial contribution in team activities. Others contend that the distinctions in their leadership styles make women be at a higher ground in light of their interpersonal affectability and human relations abilities. Nevertheless, a viable leader should be a good listener, persuasive, and supportive to their workers. Women appear to show improvement on these over men.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In conclusion, the styles that women utilize make them better moderators when managing others. Women know this and utilize this in their leadership positions. However, women have a hard time accessing senior leadership positions as compared to men. In this case, it is evident that sexual generalization of women as warm, and sustaining and the relating generalization of men as cold and tyrant may add to the prevalent discernment that women are less effective leaders.
References
Appelbaum, S. H., Audet, L., & Miller, J. C. (2013). Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 24 (1), 43-51.
