NOHS is a code of ethics for workers providing human professional services aimed at protecting their rights and dignity. The ethical standard provides its employees with values that promote respect for individual human dignity, reverence for cultural diversity, facilitating social justice, honesty, genuineness, objectivity, and integrity. On the other hand, the APA code of ethics acts as a guideline for professionals working within the psychology department on the most appropriate response when facing an ethical or moral dilemma. The principles supported by the APA code of standard advocate for foreseeable expectations on the eventuality being deliberated. Human service professional might find it difficult to determine whether to use NOHS or the APA code of ethics when dealing with difficult clients. It is likely that a human service provider will consider using the APA code of ethics due to numerous benefits it presents the practitioner. Using the APA code of ethics instead of NOHS ethics is legal among professional service provider because it allows the practitioner to consult with peers and also terminate the working relationship.
The APA code of ethics enables the human service provider working with the difficult client consider multiple values that will ease resistance from the client. The NOHS ethics does not have this attribute because the therapist is required to adhere to a set of values. It is likely that observing such values will not be significant while working with the present client because he does not cooperate (Chenneville & Gabbidon, 2019) . Consequently, the APA code of ethics requires that the human service professional should be patient with the client and demonstrate empathy and understanding waiting for their response. Nevertheless, when psychologist exercise patience and it fails to work, the APA code of ethics requires the use of re-appraisal strategy to see the big picture about the current scenario of the client. The human professional therapy is allowed to consider other alternatives that would enhance the relationship with the client.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The APA code of ethics further allows the human service provider to consider either terminating the working relation or seek support from peers when working with a difficult client. APA ethics observed by psychologists allow clients to question the credibility and competence of their psychologists and terminate the relationship if unsatisfied. Similarly, the human service provider has permission to end the relationship when it is evident that there are no shared expectations and responsibilities with the client. Alternatively, the psychologist is recommended to also seek for support from other human service professions to assess whether the client will cooperate (Clay, 2017) . The psychologists are encouraged to express their difficulties when dealing with difficult clients with peers and ask for suggestions on ways to improve the situation. However, it is essential that the confidentiality of the client is retained during such consultations.
It is legal for a human service provider to use APA code of ethics instead of NOHS when dealing with a difficult client. The APA code of ethics is more suitable compared to NOHS because it allows the individual to implement different strategies to encourage the client to cooperate. For instance, the human service provider ought to exercise patient when dealing with the patient and persist in identifying a solution. On the other hand, the APA code of ethics allows the practitioner to consult from peers when facing a challenge or terminate a working relationship with a client who does not cooperate. Subsequently, it is essential that a human service professional settles to use a code of ethics that best works in dealing with individual clients.
References
Chenneville, T., & Gabbidon, K. (2019). Application of the APA ethics code for psychologists working in integrated care settings: Potential conflicts and resolutions. Ethics & Behavior , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1683739
Clay, R. A. (2017). Coping with challenging clients. APA Organization, 48 (7). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/07-08/challenging-clients
