The murder happened in a room, where two college ladies, Mina and Rachel resided. These two had nothing in common, to begin with, the two barely communicated and even saw each other face to face; however, it did not mean they spite each other as they had nothing to say to each other. The ladies had different personalities, Mina had a nerdish character, intelligent and lacked social skills while Rachel was outgoing, self-indulgent, party girl, disorganized and too loud. The two had never had one on one conversation until one evening when they had a heated argument. The next morning Mina was found dead in the room blood all over the place.
The cause of argument was that Mina lashed out that Rachel did not respect their boundaries, she was a kind of person that would come back in the room after a heavy drink mess up the place, wore Mina clothes and shoes when she had piled up her dirty clothes, eat and drink from Mina’s utensils and failed to wash them, hold parties in their room where her friends would wreck everything, only to leave Mina afterward to clean after their messes. It had became a habit for so long, and Mina did not speak up; it was until that moment that Mina had this quarrel with her roommate. There was no sign of any struggle in the room or forced entry or broken windows. The prime suspect at this juncture was the roommate, but Rachel says that after the argument, she found it hard to fall asleep, the time she left the room, Mina was very much alive. Rachel says she did not spend the rest of the night in that room, and she had alibis to confirm it. The neighbors around confirmed to have these two quarreling; however, Rachel maintains her innocence. Rachel was taken to the crime scene to identify any missing objects she particularly states the porcelain vase which she noticed Mina loved staring at it. The police did not have any reason to hold her since the she had more than one alibi to corroborate her account.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
During the police probe, there was a phone recovered from the crime scene; it was Mina’s cellphone. Her last communication was to man known as Randy; from the nature of message texts between the two, it seemed that they were in an intimate relationship. It also seems that Randy was the last person to see her alive; he was also brought in as a suspect. It appeared that the attacker tried to clear up the evidence, as there was a piece of porcelain vase found under the carpet with Randy’s DNA. The autopsy reports also revealed that a blunt object hit the victim, and she had sharp cut on the head and neck, and also, her assailant attacked her from behind. The police also identified the porcelain vase pictures in the deceased phone gallery. The court upheld the ruling that Randy should be in police custody until the trials are on.
Both the prosecution and the defenses opted for an outside court settlement, where the accused pleaded guilty in exchange of a lesser sentence ( Ashworth, 2015) . In the court proceedings arranged by both parties, the prosecution and the defense attorneys will inform the court about the decision. The judge now have to review the decision to affirm the defendant has forfeited his right to a trial. Randy had to also testify under oath to the fact his guilty verdict was exclusively his decision, and he did it knowingly and informed. He was then required to sign a consent form stating that he had waivered his rights. The final verdict from the judge was that Randy was to serve15 years in prison with parole.
References
Ashworth, A. (2015). Sentencing and criminal justice . Cambridge University Press. Ashworth, A. (2015). Sentencing and criminal justice . Cambridge University Press.
Monahan, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2016). Risk assessment in criminal sentencing. Annual review of clinical psychology , 12 , 489-513.
