Moving through Holley’s article “ Nano Revolution – Big Impact”, it becomes apparent that the author draws particular attention to getting to the point of how emerging nanotechnologies are likely to transform the future of education along with business community within the U.S. society. Arguably, in Holley’s view, one cannot help but encounter the fact that the contemporary scientists appear to constantly revolutionize the public’s attitude towards the role that nanotechnology should actually play. It is important to highlight the fact that an in-depth insight on nanosize super particles gives the chance to vividly see their unprecedentedly new electrical and chemical properties. Contemplating upon the given article, one should be conscious that the author makes an emphasis on the way the ongoing nanotechnology may potentially create a number of entirely new industries.
As the article progresses, one can assume that Holley alludes to the fact that it is high time to come to understanding a two-fold nature of industrial revolutions. The focus here lies in arguing that the raise of industrial revolutions came to directly contribute to radical changes in terms of living conditions. Notwithstanding this fact, one has to know that in addition to substantial innovations that drove industrial revolutions, the population emerged to be exposed to new challenges as well.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Unlike industrial revolutions, nanotechnology can be identified as encompassing more potential power. Yet, despite the rapid global spread of nanotechnology, the author expresses serious concerns over insufficient funding to support and accelerate nanotechnology researches. Obviously, the article communicates a dire need for the reconsideration of key functions that nanotechnology should predominantly perform in the turbulent times of the early 21 st century. In particular, it is important to indicate that Holley puts a lot of effort into conveying the idea that “a catch-all phenomenon” nanotechnology must be viewed as a chance to overcome the barriers to raising population wellbeing. According to Holley, publicly self-conscious masses of people need to ascertain that nanotechnology-based techniques may impact our lives only after being implemented into practice; otherwise, breakthrough innovations will continue to be predominantly a matter of hot debates. The author draws parallels between nanotechnology and batteries, claiming that batteries can also serve as a source of power only after being “...installed in a product to power the application.” (Holley, 2009, p. 17)
Speculating upon Holley’s survey on the primary objectives in nanotechnology, it is worth pinpointing that the author pays special attention to the extent to which people understand the significance of science; and, unfortunately, the National Science Foundation-funded survey made it clear that the prevailing majority of Americans “...had not heard anything or at most very little about nanotechnology.” (Holley, 2009, p. 12) Additionally, the Oklahoma Nanotechnology Impact Survey (ONIS) offered pretty much the same findings. Taking a view of the given statistics, one can assume that it has been heavily influenced by the raise of both ethical and social concerns mostly nourished by the Congress of the United States. Yet, after a thorough consideration, the author comes to reveal some hidden facets of an official U.S. strategy for nanotechnology that rejects the idea that nanotech innovations could contribute to a sustainable world.
Despite some looming risks that America’s authorities rely on, it appears to be certain that the implications of nanotechnology are likely to be mostly positive. Specifically speaking, the potential benefits of nanotechnology development indisputably outweigh some probable risks; and a sharpened focus on, for instance, incurable diseases that nanomedicine may potentially shift to the list of treatable maladies would actually make sense. The point is that the public should be finally reassured that nanotechnology does not necessarily change the world for the worse; although many express their concerns over the risk of privacy breaches, the actual initiatives and strategies for development of nanotechnology-based techniques appear to have nothing to do with the intrusion into the personal life of people. Consequently, Americans have to cease taking a negative stance towards the spread of nanotechnology within U.S. society in general and some specific industries in particular.
Yes, the 21 st century can be characterized by sticking to the principles of digital culture, and, therefore, nanotechnology should definitely not be rejected due to being an integral part of the ongoing era of technological advancement. Supposedly, the authorities have to integrate nanotechnologies into both business community and educational institutions, since making nanoscience seem to be tightly linked to a daily life increases the likelihood of competing in today’s tough job realities. It is investable that America’s need for nanoscientists today is hard to exaggerate; and despite the fact that many raise contentious issues in nanotechnology, the given branch of science has a vast future ahead of it.
Moving through the article “Nano Revolution – Big Impact”, one cannot help but become aware that the author considers nanotechnology-based techniques as an opportunity to go beyond the limits of some most common interpretations of what drives societal changes. Surely, Holley makes an attempt to convince both U.S. authorities and the public of his point, which consists in a need to get adapted to the current speed at which nanotechnology is constantly evolving. Most importantly, it becomes evident that nanotechnology revolution should not be underestimated from the perspective of positive effects on both business and education. Arguably, producing new materials that has a strong connection to a “general purpose” of nanotechnology increases the odds of coming up with devices “...that operate at the cellular level for biological and medical applications.” (Holley, 2009, p. 17)
References
Holley, S, E. (2009). Nano Revolution – Big Impact: How Emerging Nanotechnologies Will
Change the Future of Education and Industry in America (and More Specifically in Oklahoma) An Abbreviated Account. Journal of Technology Studies , 35 (1), 9-19.
