According to Hitler, races are supposed to behave like species by associating with the like and seeking to destroy the unlike. Furthermore, he believes that this is a law about the social struggle which he compares to the law of gravity. Hitler was candid about his arguments stating that the intermingling of the higher and lower races led to the end of the cultured people. Moreover, the original race perished due to the poisoning of their blood through mixing with the, unlike persons. The scenario is similar to the behavior of species since the original species of animals disappear if they mate with other species.
The fallacy that is present in this argument is that humans cannot reason and form a new association as this is affected by nature. Although nature may dictate the ability of species to mingle with each other, it is the reality that humans can decide the direction of their future associations. Consequently, the whole idea behind Hitler's argument is not authentic.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A monster is defined in the book as something different and unnatural as opposed to Hitler's argument that nature determines future racial compositions. The contradiction is that while the book believes that the result of the association between people coming from different ethnic backgrounds is a monster. A monster is something unwanted in society. However, monsters are a creation by human beings through their associations. On the contrary, Hitler believes that the association between people from different racial backgrounds is determined through natural forces. As a result, it means monsters are created based on natural causes. However, monsters are human creations.
